User talk:CommotioCerebri
a heads-up[edit]
You have been warned about wikistalking on several occasions already [1], [2], [3], [4].
This morning I edited Jack Letts ([ and] Talk:Jack Letts)
You nominated that article for deletion exactly two hours later.. You give the strong appearance of wikistalking again.
Stop.
WP:What Wikipedia is not has a subsection Wikipedia_is_not_a_battleground. Your wikistalking of my efforts is not in compliance with this policy. Geo Swan (talk) 18:30, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Query[edit]
Could you connect an e-mail account to your userpage? I would appreciate if you can. Thanks.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 03:21, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- TheGracefulSlick, I initiated a sockpuppet investigation against this wiki-ID, at WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Renamed user 49274c4c204245204241434b. Geo Swan (talk) 23:47, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks Geo Swan. Ironically, I think I was going to ask the editor about sockpuppetry but didn't want to make any on-wiki accusations.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 00:33, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- I first raised a concern over using multiple IDs on May 8th, writing, in part: "Point of order... Are you CommotioCerebri also contributing as 2605:8D80:6A4:7C4E:9883:EC1C:31FB:AED0, and maybe other wiki-IDs? Don't do that. It is regarded as a technique some sneaky people have used to make it look like other people agree with them. It is called sockpuppetry, and people hate sockpuppets." FWIW, they then denied using multiple IDs.
- Thanks Geo Swan. Ironically, I think I was going to ask the editor about sockpuppetry but didn't want to make any on-wiki accusations.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 00:33, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Personally, I think it is best to voice concerns over the simultaneous use of multiple accounts on wiki. When a contributor behavior really gets bad the earlier the diff oen can provide tha shows a good faith attemp to raise one's concerns, the better.