User talk:Comparsalondon

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Comparsalondon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made a case against user Alexbrn because he is not allowing any edits on the page "Functional medicine". The page, as it stands, needs a more neutral tone. I tried to work on this but he had my account deleted from Wikipedia. When I opened a case against him, I was accused of maliciously trying to tarnish Alexbrn's account, when all I was trying to do was to point out the bias tone of the article in question. I request that I may be allowed to edit articles once again, and that the article "Functional medicine" be reviewed for manipulative activity

Decline reason:

Clear sockpuppet account being used. only (talk) 23:54, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2016[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:11, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]