User talk:Connor122

April 2023[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to 666 (number), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:51, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Conor. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Night Watch (talk) 14:01, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Blaze Wolf was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: You are not notable. This joke is also not appropriate for Wikipedia.

― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:56, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Connor122! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:56, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Conor, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Conor was changed by Connor122 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.978643 on 2023-04-24T14:03:18+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:03, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism, as you did at Connor.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:13, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Connor122/sandbox[edit]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as User:Connor122/sandbox, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 11:18, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]