Jump to content

User talk:Conquistador2k6/archive 16

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amy Greenwood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alan Fletcher.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Olly Taylor (Family Affairs) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Singular award nomination is insufficient.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 17:44, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Cameron Davenport has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 17:47, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Former to Past

[edit]

Hey. I'd hold off changing any more classifications for the time being, as there's an ongoing discussion about this and 'former' is the favoured option (if it is to remain in the ibox at all). - JuneGloom07 Talk 01:55, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to give you a link to the discussion in case you wanted to check it out. Template talk:Infobox soap character#Past or Former - JuneGloom07 Talk 17:15, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stacey Slater, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daily Star.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Emmerdale task force

[edit]

Hello – I noticed that you were listed as an active participant on the Emmerdale task force prior to its recent revival. I moved all of the inactive users to the former participants list, and left the active ones on the active list. However, since it has been many years since there was activity, I wanted to drop in and ask if you are still willing to be part of the task force. If so, great! There are a list of tasks that we would love you to be involved in – if not, it'd be great if you could either move yourself to the inactive participants list, or let me know and I can do it. Thank you! – DarkGlow (contribstalk) 16:34, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Doreen Corkhill

[edit]

You may have noticed that I have been improving some Brookside articles that were targeted for AFD. I noticed you added this to Doreen Corkhill's article. I know it was 2011, but where did you get the information from? I cannot find anything to suggest she appeared in 1988 or 1990, aside from her duration in the 20 Years of Brookside book listing her duration as 1985-1990. I am confused because I have a magazine interview in which Fitzgerald states she refused to return in 1988. If you can help that would be great.Rain the 1 00:00, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I just thought you might have known if she came back for a wedding or special episode.Rain the 1 16:58, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Neighbours characters (1994), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Julie Martin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jamie Noble, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cesaro.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:The Karate Kid characters has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:The Karate Kid characters has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 01:42, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Terence Turner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 18:15, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Tom Kennedy (Neighbours) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 14:22, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Coronation Street characters (1982), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Adamson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of EastEnders characters (2021), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Bye.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of EastEnders characters (1994), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jane Harris.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of EastEnders characters (2016), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Martin Fowler.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Nick Bates/oldversion" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Nick Bates/oldversion. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 27#Nick Bates/oldversion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 22:31, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Book ref

[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you forgot to provide the page number(s) for the source you added here. If you could add it to the ref that would really help with verifiability. - JuneGloom07 Talk 00:10, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]