User talk:Considerusinga

Welcome[edit]

Welcome...

Hello, Considerusinga, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome! SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 03:43, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NOlympics LA[edit]

Hello, Considerusinga,

Do not accuse another editor of bias ESPECIALLY when that editor has created the original article page you're concerned with and has taken the time to welcome you to Wikipedia. If you have a disagreement about an edit, do not randomly revert but start a discussion on the article talk page. Civility is a must on Wikipedia and you need to find a way to work with others who might hold different opinions from your own.

If you have questions about Wikipedia policies, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:36, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Liz, If you look through the revision history, you will see I was not making accusations of bias but referring to a comment that editor made on unhelpful edits they made: "I do not condone support this organization because of the organizations they partnered" -- user has been editing the page with inaccurate information and incorrect grammar, then accusing me of having improper grammar. I am brand new to this and feel like I'm being gaslit. I have warned the user. Considerusinga (talk) 04:50, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the NOlympics LA[edit]

To be honest, when it comes to political stuff like that. I am not good at expressing neutrality. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 10:15, 30 November 2021 (UTC) Perhaps avoid editing specific Wikipedia topics if you feel you are incapable of being biased.Considerusinga (talk) 10:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno, nothing they did not plan did important but if they did, the news will be watching. We will have to see for the next 7 years. I had learnt my lession regarding bias and events that are unimportant. I think its better for me to use the talk page when it comes to things like that. I had crossed the sources off too (the sources that the article doesn't need). Also, Liz already told me about this too. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 10:32, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Casey Wasserman[edit]

I get that you dislike Wasserman, but filling his page with sensationalist bs is not an answer. Yes, in your opinion he is a sexual abuser (as well as someone involved in covering up the USA Gymnastics scandal?), he wants to forcefully remove LA homeless population, he supports the local police department (??? notable), he’s a democratic donor, yet contributed to Bush in 2004, and he has been on the Activision board, with some of its members having been accused of sexual harassment (no relation to Wasserman). More than a half of this bs is not related to Wasserman, the rest is hardly notable. 81.9.126.217 (talk) 04:07, 25 February 2022 (UTC) How is any of the page sensationalist? It's all true and relevant, and none of it is defamatory. At no point does the page allege or imply he is a sexual abuser.[reply]

CS1 error on Casey Wasserman[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Casey Wasserman, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:33, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]