User talk:Cookiegirl3000

February 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kim Sanders, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. ∑∆∏ 19:12, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kim Sanders, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 09:04, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove sourced content or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Kim Sanders with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.--Harout72 (talk) 16:47, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

editing kim sanders' page..

hello,

I am Kim Sanders, the same Kim Sanders who is the artist described on this page. My user name is 'Cooiegirl3000'. I am only correcting the information on my page as some of the press references to my personal life is incorrect. Plus I wish to ensure that the English grammar is correct which it has not been. Please DO NOT edit this page without proper and accurate information.

Thank you..

Kim Sanders

== Re: Editing kim sanders' page

I still haven't reverted your last edit but I'd like to bring one of the main Wikipeida's policies to your attention, and that is Wikipedia:Verifiability which states: The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—whether readers can check that material in Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true. That said, I've come across more than one reliable source in German claiming that Kim Sanders and Christopher Von Deylen were in a relationship for three years, that includes Berliner Kurier, Bild.

How can we as editors be sure that you are Kim Sanders and the information in reliable sources is incorrect? Do you keep removing the information about the relationship because Sanders (supposedly you) and Von Deylen have never been a couple? Or do you keep removing that information because the three-year-long part about the relationship is incorrect?--Harout72 (talk) 16:35, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]