User talk:CoolHero10

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of CadAPL (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:10, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CoolHero10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I edited these pages European Cup and UEFA Champions League records and statistics and List of footballers with 100 or more UEFA Champions League appearances, then I got blocked ! Can someone explain why I should be blocked ? Previously, I read a version where there was a section for goalkeepers, those were deleted even though they were referenced ! so I looked into the page's history and brought back that data ! CoolHero10 (talk) 12:59, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for your block. Yamla (talk) 13:08, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Off hand, I'd say evidence exists that you are a WP:sockpuppet.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:09, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CoolHero10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Off hand ! You say that there is evidence ! I am not an expert of editing so I took back the designated version related to goalkeepers' section then edited afterwards ! The other user claims that I should address the reason of my block, first I am asking the same question, second, it seems that you think I am related to that edit's author ! If you consider that as I brought back those data, why don't you accuse the user who retrieved my edits for this List of footballers with 100 or more UEFA Champions League appearances as MY sockpuppet ? CoolHero10 (talk) 13:21, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Based on your behavioural ticks and the technical evidence, you are certainly another CadAPL sock. Can you not find something productive to do with your time? Talk page access revoked. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:18, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.