User talk:Coolguy3478

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Coolguy3478, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Kb03 (talk) 17:14, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018[edit]

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Untitled Avengers film for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Also, please only suggest potential sources to add if they are reliable. MCUExchange, YouTube, and fan social media accounts are not reliable. Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:09, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That Was Samuel L. Jackson's Instagram BTW.Also Someone Told Me This That I'm Doing.He Is A Huge Fan.He Has Merch.Oh and He Is Saying That Because Of The 21st Century Fox Merger,The X-Men Will Be There Coolguy3478 (talk) 21:16, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sandrobost. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Star Wars: Episode IX, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sandrobost (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The 21st Century Fox Merger Was What I Meant By The Edit Coolguy3478 (talk) 22:20, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on The Amazing World of Gumball. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. VictorTorres2002 (talk) 01:13, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But CN Schedule Archive And Valiksbum 94 Said It Would End In 2019 Coolguy3478 (talk) 03:26, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Coolguy3478, Please check this link so you would know it:

https://www.regularcapital.com/2018/10/more-seasons-of-the-amazing-world-of-gumball-is-still-a-possiblity/. VictorTorres2002 (talk) 04:33, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Then Check This Link:https://cnschedulearchive.tumblr.com/image/178829812680 And This Link:https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DMWttg7E6aA Coolguy3478 (talk) 13:36, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful, and format your comments correctly[edit]

Please do not post replies to comments you have not read and understood, as you appear to have done here, and in future it would be good if you used standard indentation (add the appropriate number of ":"s before your comment) and did not begin every word with an upper-case letter. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 03:20, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Please. Stop. Capitalizing. Each. Word. Thank. You. --Ebyabe (talk) 04:09, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Listen,I Actually Found Sources This Time.When Coolbruh123 Added Groot,He Sourced It,But Someone Removed It. Oh And I'm Sorry If I Captialize Each Letter.It's A Habit I Have. Coolguy3478 (talk) 04:59, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:Coolbruh123, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Larry Hockett (Talk) 17:26, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019[edit]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Crboyer (talk) 00:31, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But I made them, so I have a right to remove them if I want too. Coolguy3478 (talk) 01:17, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Crboyer: I think he is making a legitimate point.--Biografer (talk) 03:07, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe. But on the other hand, the user changed the heading of another user's post (here)Crboyer (talk) 03:09, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Crboyer: Well, you can always put it back. I mean the header. Why do an edit war over it?--Biografer (talk) 03:29, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

He does not have the right to remove other people’s talk page comments. It doesn’t matter that he started the discussion. The rule that says he can remove it only applies to his own talk page. And he didn’t just remove his own comments, but those of 4 others at least. On a page that wasn’t his.--Fradio71 (talk) 22:40, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

He does too, if it breaches the policies which it did. He started the discussion as a forum and that is not what Wikipedia is intended for in the first place. Now, I am not saying screw the rules and guidelines. What I am saying is that if he can not remove comments which are in violation of WP:NOTFORUM, maybe an admin can look at it and decide weather it should be removed or not. My believe, is that if it does breach WP:NOTFORUM rule, then an admin should remove it.--Biografer (talk) 23:56, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You actually literally do not. When you make any edit to Wikipedia, including edits to talk pages, your contributions are made under the GFDL and Creative Commons Share Alike 3.0 License. Did you not read the text above the "Publish changes" button before you submitted them? —Locke Cole • t • c 17:20, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Sears. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 22:11, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have made this exact same edit at least once before. Then, as now, it was unsourced and premature, as a review of any online news source will tell you. This is getting tiresome. If you continue to make this edit or something like it at Sears without a citation of a reliable source that supports it, it will be treated as vandalism. General Ization ^Talk 22:16, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk page comments[edit]

As you seem to be ignoring attempts to discuss this with you here, I'll try once more. You do not have a right to remove comments you've submitted. You made these contributions under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 License AND the GFDL. In removing your comments, you also remove the comments of other editors. If you were to selectively delete only your comments, then their comments would have no context. If you stop removing and re-adding the section, it will eventually get archived, but each time you make an edit, I believe you reset the clock on that.

If you persist in attempting to remove the comments, you may be blocked from editing for persistent vandalism. —Locke Cole • t • c 21:35, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/877201062 Look What Was Done Here Coolguy3478 (talk) 23:06, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So Then How Come He Can Remove THOSE Coolguy3478 (talk) 23:11, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because that user is a bot, an automated user. And that "user" is archiving those comments. There's a huge difference between a human user and a bot. Crboyer (talk) 01:48, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's Not Fair At All Coolguy3478 (talk) 20:52, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How's that? Everyone else lives within these limitations, and the archive bot doesn't remove the messages and hide them, it puts them in an archive where anyone can read them later. —Locke Cole • t • c 19:22, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019[edit]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Dora the Explorer (film), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sources say family film. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 02:58, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.romper.com/p/a-live-action-dora-the-explorer-movie-is-coming-but-its-definitely-not-what-parents-are-expecting-2986855 Coolguy3478 (talk) 03:01, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It Says "Rated R" Coolguy3478 (talk) 03:01, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That is not a real reliable source. - FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 03:04, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What Makes It Not Reliable.It Says Stuff About Guns And Killing.You'd Expect That In A Family Film? Coolguy3478 (talk) 03:06, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The source does not say that the new movie will be rated "R". It says that some of the people who watched the original program are now old enough to watch an R-rated movie. Do you understand the difference? And no, romper.com is not known to be a reliable source. General Ization ^Talk 03:08, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 72 hours[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:31, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]