User talk:Coreyfrench100
Coreyfrench100, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]
|
Hi Coreyfrench100! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Queries
[edit]Hello Corey and welcome to Wikimedia. I saw your message at Commons and I feel that perhaps you could do with some friendly advice. Firstly Wikipedia is not the same thing as Wikimedia Commons, although they both fall under the same umbrella. Basically Wikipedia is mainly about articles and Commons is about images and other files. Secondly, your entire contribution to these projects seems to be about yourself. Your user page reads like a CV or an election manifesto and is almost certainly in contravention of the guidelines at WP:NOTWEBHOST, particularly item #1. Certainly, many of us have some biographical material on our user pages but no to this extent. Technically I should nominate your user page for speedy deletion but I'm a fairly lenient person, so I've added a NOINDEX marker to stop the page appearing in search engines. I strongly advise you to read WP:User pages and the conflict of interest page. The latter is especially important if you are thinking of writing an article about yourself. The simple answer is don't because if you are notable enough (WP:Notability), someone will write an article about you eventually. So please change your user page to a more appropriate tone as soon as possible or I will have to nominate it for deletion.
The second problem is your photos at Commons, each of which you have marked as being "own work". Quite simply "give credit where credit is due". A lot of people upload images under the mistaken belief that if they have a photo in their possession or they bought a painting then they own the copyright to said photo or painting. Let me simplify it even further - just because I might buy a can of pop to drink, it doesn't mean I suddenly own the trademarks and the secret ingredients of the pop. In the same way, if you are physically in a photo, then the photo was probably taken by someone else i.e. it is not "own work". Obviously if it looks like you are holding a camera or phone and taking a "selfie" then it isn't a problem. However there are other factors to consider:
- File:Corey french.jpg is acceptable for Commons because users are allowed a small number of personal photos of themselves. However you still need to make clear whether you took that photo or someone else did and if it is someone else, then you need to show us that you had permission to put the photo on Commons.
- File:Corey French MYP. Strabane Youth Summit 2013.jpg is a photo that fits into the scope of Wikimedia Commons - Commons:Scope because it shows a public activity taking place with a clear educational use per Commons:Educational use. However, you are sat some distance away, so please change the file page to show who took the photo and provide us with clear evidence of permission to use that photo from the photographer.
- File:Strabane Strictly.jpg and File:Strabane Strictly 2.jpg are public photos but it isn't clear whether this is a major event or a private dinner party. Please expand the description of these photos to clearly explain what the photos are showing, so we can see clearly whether they have educational uses in line with Commons:Educational use. Equally important is the fact that you clearly did not take these photos because you are dancing in the middle of the room. So you need to clarify this issue and provide clear permission from the photographer.
- File:Election poster, Local gov 2014.jpg has the same problems because we need to know who took that picture of you and whether they gave permission for it to be used like this.
If these photos are from a website, then you should provide the URL in the source section of the file summary, and the source URL should clearly label these photos as being freely licensed. If the photos are not on the web, then you need to ask the photographer to send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org using the format at Commons:Email templates. If everything checks out, an OTRS agent will add an appropriate marker to your files so that any uncertainty is removed. Please note that it isn't sufficient for you to just say here that you have permission. It needs to be an email and there is a verification process. Finally, don't feel overwhelmed by all of this, and feel free to ask for help, especially at the Teahouse (the invitation is at the top of the page). Green Giant (talk) 19:10, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Election poster, Local gov 2014.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Election poster, Local gov 2014.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
