User talk:Cornconsumer

June 2018[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Stool has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Stool was changed by Cornconsumer (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.920411 on 2018-06-21T03:20:35+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:20, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Billy the Kid. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -★- PlyrStar93 _{→Message me. ←} 03:23, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Cornconsumer[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:Cornconsumer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kpgj hpjm 03:35, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because it does not violate any rules set by Wikipedia and helps achieve Wikipedia's goal. The things stated in this page are true and here for the benefit of the public. The gaming community is set apart from the rest of society in many ways so many people have not heard of "Cornconsumer" or only know a little and want to know more.

June 2018[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Shia LaBeouf. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:52, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Timeline of the Napoleonic era, you may be blocked from editing. CarelessWombat^{Let's Talk!} 20:33, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege was changed by Cornconsumer (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.88638 on 2018-12-07T20:54:38+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:54, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:00, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of "Nopolianic wars"[edit]

Nopolianic wars, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is vandalism.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Dylan620 (talk) 20:58, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cornconsumer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Im sorry, I left my account logged in at a public library and someone took advantage of that to vandalize wiki. I realize this is my fault and will try to allways remember to log out now, or the not use public computers for editing. I inherited this account from a friend who used it for vandalism. I used to edit but it was allways flagged as vandalism when i edited minor grammer mistakes i found so i stopped editing, however i would still like to be able to edit just in case i ever find a wiki that has obviously been changed for the worse. Cornconsumer (talk) 20:43, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Just how often does this happen to you? I'm not seeing any helpful edits here. Huon (talk) 20:51, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cornconsumer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I inherited this account from a friend who used it for vandalism. I used to edit but it was allways flagged as vandalism when i edited minor grammer mistakes i found so i stopped editing, however i would still like to be able to edit just in case i ever find a wiki that has obviously been changed for the worse.Cornconsumer (talk) 20:59, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't believe your explanation, as I examined every edit from this account and it is as Huon describes below. Even if I did believe you, compromised accounts are not unblocked- and you also state you "inherited" the account; accounts cannot be shared. Request declined. 331dot (talk) 21:19, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So this account is compromised. It cannot be unblocked. Also, all those comma changes? They introduced grammar mistakes. Huon (talk) 21:03, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect your only pathway back would be the standard offer, including an explanation of exactly what constructive edits you want to make. 331dot (talk) 21:20, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]