User talk:CorruptVaccines

November 2019[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bart Sibrel has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bart Sibrel was changed by CorruptVaccines (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.917578 on 2019-11-28T12:13:39+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:13, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CorruptVaccines, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

TheAwesome Hwyh 06:15, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Too bad I just have this account. I can prove it as well. Good luck with your superstitious investigation CorruptVaccines (talk) 11:47, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. - TNT ^💖 17:49, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CorruptVaccines (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made accurate edits and was targeted and reviewed for sock puppetry which which was unfounded and false. I commented that it was false and that I could prove it but was blocked and labeled not here to build an encyclopedia which is yet again false CorruptVaccines (talk) 19:52, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your edits were manifestly inappropriate. Yamla (talk) 20:18, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CorruptVaccines (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

y blocking is justified under false pretenses. My comments were not manifested inappropriately but with accuracy. This is clandestine behavior from wiki adminsCorruptVaccines (talk) 12:55, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There is nothing clandestine about this. We are openly telling you that it is clear you are not here to work collaboratively to build this encyclopedia. You will need to find somewhere else to push your views. Because this block is appropriate, I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 13:17, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.