User talk:Costho

January 2009[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Anarchism. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 01:49, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, not me. I'm not in an edit war. If I am then you're edit warring too since you're deleting material that I put in the article. So please, don't be silly. Let's be honest. You just don't like the change I'm making to the article so you're calling it "edit warring," otherwise you would have left this same message to those deleting the material. Maybe you should leave messages on their pages as well in order to save face. Costho (talk) 01:52, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a reminder about WP:3RR. Any further reverts may result in your being blocked. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 17:53, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thanks for looking out for me. You're a sweetheart! I'll make sure I give it some time then. Costho (talk) 17:55, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're again approaching the limits of tolerance towards edit-warring. Please respect the discussion. Skomorokh 23:40, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't insult my intelligence. If my putting the material in is edit warring. Then you or anyone else taking it out is edit warring as well. And I have been engaging in the discussion. You haven't. So don't tell me to "respect the discussion." Costho (talk) 23:43, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Anarchism. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Tiptoety ^talk 00:59, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Costho (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe the administrator made a mistake. The rule against more than 3 reverts. I made no more than 3 reverts in a 24 hour period. I was reported here [1], and as you can see I didn't violate the rule.

Decline reason:

Though the edits listed below by Tiptoety are over a slightly larger that 24 hour period, 3RR is not an entitlement, and you can hardly deny that edit warring was going on there. --fvw * 01:24, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1, 2, 3, and 4. Tiptoety ^talk 01:10, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Anarchism. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Please take a moment and read WP:POINT and WP:DE. You have already been blocked once for disrupting this article. Please don't let this become a habit. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 04:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]