User talk:Countzer

Welcome!

Hello, Countzer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

TheRingess 05:59, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! --Rory0 96 04:20, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I have now found the proper procedure for deleting unnecessary pages. Thank you for your time. (Countzer 04:37, 10 February 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks.[edit]

Thanks for the mention on me doing a good job. Wish I could help you on the wackbag thing, but I'm banned there also.--XMBRIAN 23:03, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just talked to the mods, you can reason with them if you are actually a fan and not a troll. (Count Zero 22:33, 15 February 2006 (UTC))[reply]

yeah, well... not after what i've said and done there. (actually, it all happened off the board.) i'm one of the outcasts to the other boards.--XMBRIAN 01:43, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Opie and Anthony Censorship[edit]

This isn't Wackbag or a fan site. This is facts about the Opie and Anthony show. The Anthony/Melinda/Spaz relationship is part of the show. It's the only reason Anthony even knows her. If censor it on Wackbag, that's their site, their choice. Here we deal in truth, not censoring. Stop removing facts that you don't like. That's called vandalism. Continue and you will be banned. --Attention Whore 23:01, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, so the POV sections you are editing in repeatedly are vandalism, and YOU will be banned. (Count Zero 01:55, 16 February 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Re: Deletion of List of Howard Stern Guests[edit]

I suppose you are referring to List of celebrity guests on the Howard Stern show? A simple majority is not a consensus. A consensus something like a supermajority, somewhere around 70% or more (although my personal standards of a consensus is slightly higher). The discussion with a 13 out of 22 votes, ~59% majority hence has not reached a consensus in my opinon. If you still have doubts, please feel free to clarify with me on my talkpage. Thank you! :) - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 13:42, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

O&A[edit]

Thanks for the message - and don't worry, if we all agreed on everything it would be a pretty boring world :) Hopefully we can all reach a consensus on this article eventually. Tufflaw 00:29, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing?[edit]

Please explain this diff [1] where you reverted to re-insert a tremendous amount of POV, misspelling, redundant linking, etc. Tufflaw 14:20, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was removing alot of POV, bad edits, etc. I was in a hurry, and any decent edits could be redone. I shouldn't

have to go through the entire page line by line to rv the decimation of the page. If you really think this is POV take a little look at the pages of many popular media figures. (Count Zero 00:55, 22 February 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Just because another page has POV doesn't mean that it's OK for this one to as well. The other page should be fixed as well. And to say that you were in a hurry, and therefore reverted a tremendous amount of work done by others just doesn't cut it. If you're pressed for time, save your editing for later. And yes, you should go through "line by line" if that's what it takes. I've been editing section by section to try to clean up the page. Please look through the diff linked above and see all of the garbage you put back into the page. Next time please try to use a little more finesse. Thank you. Tufflaw 03:08, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Opieheader.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Opieheader.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:51, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]