User talk:Courtofmiracles98

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Courtofmiracles98, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Javert2113 (Siarad.|¤) 19:39, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is Courtofmiracles98's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ryan Vigilant (April 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Javert2113 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ryan Vigilant and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ryan Vigilant, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Javert2113 (Siarad.|¤) 19:38, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Courtofmiracles98! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Javert2113 (Siarad.|¤) 19:38, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlie Buhler (May 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The film may be notable, but the subject cannot inherit that notability. We need to see significant secondary coverage of the subject. The only source that seems to come close to that is an interview which would be primary and not denote notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charlie Buhler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Charlie Buhler, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 16:34, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pandemic films has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Pandemic films has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:58, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlie Buhler (June 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Charlie Buhler instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is now an article on the subject in article space. If the article is kept, this draft will be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft can be kept.

One copy is enough.

See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Buhler, which is not applicable because it was four years ago and noted that she might be notable in the future. Determination of whether she is notable can be made in article space.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charlie Buhler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Charlie Buhler, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:38, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Does the author of this draft have any sort of financial or other connection with the subject of this draft? Please read the conflict of interest policy and the paid editing policy and make any required declarations.

You may ask for advice about conflict of interest at the Teahouse.

If this draft is resubmitted without addressing the question about conflict of interest, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:43, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Charlie Buhler has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Charlie Buhler. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:43, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Hello Courtofmiracles98. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Courtofmiracles98. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Courtofmiracles98|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS ^💬 11:43, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Courtofmiracles98, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Courtofmiracles98|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. GSS ^💬 03:44, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. GSS ^💬 03:52, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have any financial stake or connection to the subject. I am fan of indie film and this person her feature film and her acting work are very well known in the indie film world. She was also the first African American Miss South Dakota, which was very notable when she won the title years ago. For some reason her page is being forwarded to Before the Fire, which erases her acting accomplishments as well as her pageant title. I've seen many pageant queens on here, so I'm unclear why this is not seen as noteworthy. Courtofmiracles98 (talk) 16:39, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GSS ^💬 07:11, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 16:21, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Courtofmiracles98 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not have any financial stake or connection to the subject. I am fan of indie film and this person her feature film and her acting work are very well known in the indie film world. She was also the first African American Miss South Dakota, which was very notable when she won the title years ago. For some reason her page is being forwarded to Before the Fire, which erases her acting accomplishments as well as her pageant title. I've seen many pageant queens on here, so I'm unclear why this is not seen as noteworthy. Courtofmiracles98 (talk) 16:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

You were correctly blocked for failing to respond to the message about a potential conflict of interest. As you have now done that, I am willing to unblock you. However, if you want to continue to write about Charlie Buhler, please work on the draft rather than create more versions in mainspace. Since the article has previously been deleted, it should go through the AfC process. – bradv🍁 07:02, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Charlie Buhler has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Charlie Buhler. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:28, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlie Buhler has been accepted[edit]

Charlie Buhler, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:24, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Courtofmiracles98 - There is a possibility that the article may be nominated for deletion. If so, please notify me. I accepted it (after declining it earlier) and think it should be in article space. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:31, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ryan Vigilant[edit]

Hello, Courtofmiracles98. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ryan Vigilant".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:47, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]