User talk:Cozgem
November 2018
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/42/Stop_x_nuvola.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola.svg.png)
If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}}
at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
- Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
- Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Longhair\talk 21:03, 10 November 2018 (UTC)![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Cozgem (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Sir: As Administrator for Music on the Web® (can be reached at admin@musicontheweb.com), I am very surprised that you would block our account. Username: Cozgem has been editing Wikipedia pages for many years; and, unlike other contributors, we have disclosed exactly who we are and that any and all edits are complimentary; no charge for our services. We try to help people when we can, being experienced in Web design and development for over twenty years. Blocking us, just means that a lot of struggling artists will have to pay for any work done on their Wiki pages (even for minor editing, etc.). It has never been our intention to use Wikipedia for promotion and/or advertising. Every edit we contribute to an article is almost always backed by a third-party source, etc. We have never viewed Wikipedia as anything other than an online encyclopedia.
For example; take the last page we edited - Bill O'Connell (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_O%27Connell). We saw his album review on New York City Jazz Record and noticed that he had a Wiki page with a warning tag and no Discography for his new release; Jazz Latin (2018). So, we set up a Discography section for him and added three of his albums, with accompanying CD reviews. Wikipedia WAS asking for help (reliable sources, etc.)!!! For your knowledge; we don't know Bill, have never met him, don't have his email address, phone number or contact information, etc. The work (and investigation) we did on his Wiki page was free. I really think you should cut us some slack, as a longtime contributor to Wikipedia in good standing. I look forward to your reply. Thank you. Cozgem (talk) 23:53, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your use of "we" confirms that this account was shared by multiple people. That's not permitted. There's also a long, long list of copyright issues, and on that last article you edited and which you were using as an example you were adding linkspam. Of course there's also the draft that was deleted as spam. You have addresed none of those issues. Huon (talk) 13:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Cozgem. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Cozgem. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Copyright problem: Cozzetti & Gemmill
[edit] Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Cozzetti & Gemmill, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://web.archive.org/web/20150709143022fw_/http://musicontheweb.com/biography_cozzetti&gemmill.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
- Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Cozzetti & Gemmill and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Cozzetti & Gemmill, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en
wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Cozzetti & Gemmill. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Cozzetti & Gemmill with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.
It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Cozzetti & Gemmill saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:38, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Start a discussion with Cozgem
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. Start a new discussion to connect and collaborate with Cozgem. What you say here will be public for others to see.