User talk:Crazykid76

David and Mary Thomson C.I.

CrazyKid, please come discuss the student council issue at Talk:David and Mary Thomson C.I. before adding it back into the article. Thanks. --Stephane Charette 01:35, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

• CrazyKid, please come discuss at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Education in Canada or Talk:David and Mary Thomson C.I. before adding back the student council information. I don't believe that the names of students is notable, nor verifiable, and it doesn't add encyclopedic information to the school's article. --Stephane Charette 01:56, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Removing comments on your talk page

Please do not remove messages from your talk page. Talk pages exist as a record of communication, and in any case, comments are available through the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted comments. Thanks. --Stephane Charette 01:54, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

I've talked!

blanking talk pages

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content (as you did on Talk:David and Mary Thomson C.I.). Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! --Stephane Charette 04:09, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Edit summary

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. --Stephane Charette 04:16, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to David and Mary Thomson C.I.

Your recent edit to David and Mary Thomson C.I. was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 13:09, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism of David and Mary Thomson C.I....again!

Dylan, please stop. From your contributions, it is fairly obvious that User:Crazykid76 and User:Dylan Bradbury are two accounts representing the same person (see [1] and [2]). Therefore, edits such as this one qualifies as pure vandalism. You defaced the school article to supposedly leave yourself a message from one account to another. Combined with other edits you've been making (such as [3] and [4], I think you qualify as a persistent vandal. Please stop your destructive edits.

• I do not mean to be rude, but there must be some mistake. You see I created my account today, so that I could stop the vandalism of David and Mary Thomson's own webpage.

I wrote the letter to CrazyKid76, to stop the vandalism, and I apoligize, I did not now about the discussion page, and I would have originally posted it there if I would have known. I would greatly appreciate. Again, I have created my account today. I feel that I am being attacked for someone else's actions. Crazykid76 is a vandel, I am a believer in this. Ask any of my friends, and they will tell you that I am a law abiding citizen, and a role-model memeber of society. If there is a way to prove this, I will. --Dylan Bradbury 23:35, 28 May 2006 (UTC)