User talk:Cream apple

Welcome!

Hello, Cream apple, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 22:26, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Speaking Into The Air

The article Speaking Into The Air has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBOOK.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 10:59, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Suggestions for the item"People Daily"

I think the information about People Daily is not objective, especially in the history part.

There are too many personal or so-called western opinions and evalations towards People Daily invloved in the part. As the part of "history",the author should describe more facts, I mean, like mentioning more important articles and reports in this newspaper rather than critize and review it.

For example, the editor wrote:

"the paper was in fact controlled by Mao's personal secretary Hu Qiaomu."
"Newspaper articles in the People's Daily are often not read for content so much as placement. A large number of articles devoted to a political figure or idea is often taken as a sign that the mentioned official or subject is rising. Likewise with articles on geographical areas foreign or domestic; recently increased interest in Latin America has been shown.

In China, like in the rest of the world, visibility and prominence in official media communicates power. Editorials in the People's Daily are regarded both by foreign observers and Chinese readers as authoritative statements of official government policy. Thus studied with care. Distinction is made between editorials, commentaries, and opinions. Although all must be government approved, they differ sharply on the amount of official authoritativeness they contain by design – from the top."

All these contents are reviews from western perspectives instead of objective discoures.And in this part, a large segment of the contents is talking about the reports in Cultural Revolution and Tiananmen Square Protests of 1989, but just a small part of that is describing the current situation.In fact, People Daily has been in the process of changing. It has become more close to civilian with a relatively relaxed style because of its multimedia means of issuing information. And what's more, the time line here is kind of not in order.

And I also compared this piece to the counterpart in Chinese Baidu Encyclopedia. I found this piece also leaves out some important information like the influence of People Daily: 1992, People Daily has been rated as the world's top 10 newspaper by UNESO. Cream apple (talk) 03:22, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Chinese article

Please note that this is the English version of Wikipedia, and contents as well as primary titles are expected to be in English. Please be sure to understand that before proceeding your editing the article 步步惊心. Bluedeck 06:15, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 步步惊心

The article 步步惊心 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Articles consists of nearly pure plot of a show and is written in Chinese. The content of which (plot only) is unlikely to be kept even on the Chinese version of Wikipedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bluedeck 06:22, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 步步惊心

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 步步惊心, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 06:43, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, 穿越橄榄树林

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 穿越橄榄树林. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Through the Olive Trees. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Through the Olive Trees – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. JamesG5 (talk) 08:59, 29 November 2016 (UTC)