User talk:Creiamo

This is Creiamo's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of world records in life saving (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by -noah- was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of world records in life saving and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of world records in life saving, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noah ^💬 21:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Creiamo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Noah ^💬 21:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of world records in life saving has been accepted

List of world records in life saving, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~Kvng (talk) 03:33, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Account temporarily blocked (July 2021)

Extended content

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 11:38, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Creiamo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@MER-C: I acknowledge being a newcomer who clearly made a mistake that caused this blockage to be enforced, but I am NOT getting paid to edit Wikipedia and the pages that I create are NOT covert advertising. To gain confidence as a new user I started by writing on topics well known to me, while ensuring any CoI remained under control. To that end, I was very careful as to what information was published and to validate every sentence with reputable references. Evidently my perception of being totally unbiased and detached was wrong, so when the block is lifted I will replace any possibly loaded word still present and rebalance sections to make that NPOV stand out even more. Creiamo (talk) 17:47, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I think a committment to (temporarily) edit in areas unrelated to any conflict of interest would help. If you make another request, someone else will review it. 331dot (talk) 10:08, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Photo copyright

How is File:Marcello Tonelli.jpg your own work? MER-C 17:58, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MER-C: The photograph was taken at an offical event and the author granted permissions to use and modify it. The version uploaded on Wikimedia is in fact a modification made by me of the original.

If that's so, can you get him to send you an email releasing the image under the stated terms and in turn forward it to UTRS at Commons? Daniel Case (talk) 18:48, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: Uff... a long shot as that picture was taken in 2019, but I will move in that direction immediately. Whatever the outcome, next time I will make sure to seek a picture that has that written author's consent attached to it. Thank you! (Creiamo (talk) 20:02, 25 July 2021 (UTC))[reply]
@Daniel Case: Just a quick update on the photo situation. I have been told that the American University of Central Asia, sole owner of the picture, followed the instructions at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Email_templates and officially released the copyright. Creiamo (talk) 20:08, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, then, at some point soon the file page on Commons should be updated to reflect that. Daniel Case (talk) 20:35, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: It is already. Creiamo (talk) 16:22, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then, I guess this aspect of the unblock conditions is satisfied. Daniel Case (talk) 18:02, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: I'd think so. Now it is a matter of understanding what more I can do to fix my status and get back on track...Creiamo (talk) 19:47, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Related to MER-C's question, what is the nature of your conflict of interest you allude to? 331dot (talk) 18:06, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot:I have a close relationship with the person (but would prefer to remain anonymous, if possible). Being his achievements noteworthy and publicly available, I didn't think that was going to be a problem as long as I was able to simply state facts and maintain a NPOV. (Creiamo (talk) 20:02, 25 July 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Topics? Topic, singular - List of world records in life saving, which just so happens to be related to Marcello Tonelli, as is all but one of your mainspace edits (if I've tallied them correctly). This appeal doesn't make sense. MER-C 19:11, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MER-C: yes 2 topics: List of world records in life saving and Marcello Tonelli. Sorry but I still don't see the problem of them being related. Actually I thought that interrelation between pages was a positive thing; in fact something to look for as editors. I believed both topics had good enough reasons to exist and haven't read anything against that argument. As previously stated I am not getting paid for editing, so please be specific as to what other issue is there for me to clarify. Thus far I understood that I cannot write on topics too close to me (even when they have a strong basis) and that a verbal consent from an author is not enough to use/modify a picture. (Creiamo (talk) 20:02, 25 July 2021 (UTC))[reply]

You don't have to be specifically paid for editing to be a paid editor, are you paid by the subject in any capacity, even if you don't wish to reveal how? 331dot (talk) 10:19, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: I have done some research work for Tonelli in the past, but that was years ago and I have changed my profession since then. I am not being paid and had no financial interest in creating that page. Creiamo (talk) 19:29, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Future Plan

With the List page I created my first domain of interest and would like to continue editing the biographies of other lifesavers who have set world records in their sport and medalled at international competitions. In your decision on whether I should be unblocked, please consider that: I am a new user (as well as individual), was not given any warning, the type of offense/mistake made, and the efforts shown in resolving it. Best, Creiamo (talk) 01:14, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Creiamo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Evidently I had not made it clear enough in my first request, so following the reviewer's advice I commit to "edit only in areas unrelated to any conflict of interest". Creiamo (talk) 12:40, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Sounds good to me. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 05:29, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpgordon, MER-C, and 331dot:: editor was unblocked after stating 'I commit to "edit only in areas unrelated to any conflict of interest"'. First edits after unblock were to Draft:Marcello Tonelli and its talk page, and then to List of world records in life saving. These seem in direct contradiction to the unblock request. Editor then went on to create articles for non-notable life saving swimmers. Fram (talk) 11:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fram: Clearly, when blocked I couldn't rectify my mistakes on Draft:Marcello Tonelli. So all I did now in my edits was to remove possibly "loaded words", and added a couple of important references to text that was already written. If an independent 3 pages book review published in a reputable scientific journal is not notable than I clearly don't understand what the project is about.
Secondly, lifesaving is my interest (but no conflict there) and the page List of world records in life saving was never an issue for discussion. What I did was update the information with the results from 2021. Again sorry but I don't see the problem!
Finally, I have started to create stubs to populate the page as suggested by Wikipedia:Make_stubs: "So, you just wrote a killer new article, and you see lots of red links. You're surprised, because these topics would probably satisfy the notability guidelines and Wikipedia seems to have articles on every single topic imaginable. Instead of letting that red link sit there doing nothing: Make it a stub! Replacing red links with stubs helps to grow the encyclopedia..." Sorry again, but are you suggesting that a world record is non-notable? A WR means that a person has accomplished something that nobody else in the history of the sport has ever done! Is this your personal view or is Wikipedia really here to further push the popularity of countless mediocre soccer players (for example) instead of recognizing and informing about the worthiness of athletes who compete in sports that receive much less media attention? Creiamo (talk) 21:32, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

List of world records in life saving

added links pointing to David Locke, Alessandro Marchetti and Lisa Brown

World Life Saving Championships

added a link pointing to Gold Coast

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notability conversation

Hi, you seem to be creating a lot of biographies of people who lack the necessary notability to have an article on enwiki. E.g. Bruna Ravera or Jennifer Whiteley seem to lack sufficient independent, reliable sources with significant attention for them. Can you please, before you create further articles, indicate how these (and similar ones) meet our notability guidelines? Fram (talk) 11:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fram: Hello there. Those are stubs of athletes who according to the International Life Saving Federation have recorded one or more world record in their sport. Lifesaving is a sport with a history of more than 100 years (established in 1910) so to my understanding they definitely are "worthy of notice". The stubs should of course be later expanded with additional references, but I understand you removed them already. Regarding new articles, where should I indicate how these persons meet the notability guidelines, before publishing? Creiamo (talk) 21:26, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help in moving page back to mainspace (refactored from Marcello Tonelli)

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I have used time and effort to create this page. Unfortunately, I fear the intended aim of moving the article to Draft was a backdoor route to deletion.

the topic was never nominated at AfD.
I understand the reason that drove moving the article to draft status a few months ago, but that suspicion was answered and my account unblocked. However, the warning sign has not been removed from the page!
there has not been a single solicitation for content improvement.
the admin didn't link to his/her decision to move the article into draftspace nor there has ever been a deletion discussion of the page
the page remains invisible to anyone wanting to initiate AfC submission process to have the page moved back to mainspace

Creiamo (talk) 22:18, 19 December 2021 (UTC) [reply]

Extended content

@Crelamo: Strictly speaking, the {{help me}} template should be used on your own user talk page.

If you wish to submit your draft for AfC review, simply add the template {{subst:submit}} to the source text.

Since editors with conflicts of interest are allowed to create and submit drafts, submitting this draft might not be considered a violation of the terms of your unblock. Placing a disclosure on your user page would likely help keep this from becoming an issue. I see that Fram has already raised the question on your talk page, so proceed with caution. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:37, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmcgnh: Thank you for the instructions and sorry for not posting in the right place! My relationship with Dr. Tonelli was fully disclosed before the block being removed and remains available on my user page under 'Conflict of interest'. I will now proceed to add the AfC review template and replace with it the false and outdated "undisclosed payments warning".Creiamo (talk) 23:32, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Crelamo: Instead of a bunch of seemingly disconnected 'See also' entries, I recommend that you use the reviews of Tonelli's book(s) to expand that aspect of his career and organically bring up those topics with appropriate links. As {{edit request}}s, of course. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:05, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcello Tonelli has been accepted

Marcello Tonelli, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 05:37, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]