Jump to content

User talk:Critter beach

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Vena und schnitzel worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki 14:46, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Not experimenting. Vena und Schnitzel is a comedy duo. You deleted my page before I could get all of my references. Please google them and you will see pictures. How annoying you are.

The article didn't say they were a comedy duo -- it said that they were, in fact, the children of Hitler. NawlinWiki 14:54, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thats because in the 3 seconds after I accidently hit submit, you deleted it. The Hitler thing is their back story.

Speedy deletion of Vena und schnitzel[edit]

A tag has been placed on Vena und schnitzel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Hersfold (t/a/c) 15:07, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jamie album2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Jamie album2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:39, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Jamie album.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Jamie album.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:31, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wagner in Israel[edit]

You disputed (rather rudely) that Wagner remains unperformed in Israel - and you deleted the para which says so without any reference (in doing so deleting the genuine reference to the reception of Barenboim's concert). If there is any evidence of Wagner's operas being staged in Israel it would be nice to have that cited, please. If you disagree with other editors' comments, you don't have to have to be aggressive. Please read Wikipedia:Civility. Best regards, --Smerus (talk) 09:54, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Jamie McCarney, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Crusoe8181 (talk) 11:48, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]