User talk:Crunk Cup

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
IF YOU WANNA HOLLA ATCHA BOY LEAVE A MESSAGE OKAY??? Crunk Cup (talk) 20:13, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of West Seventh, Saint Paul, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/List_of_named_ethnic_enclaves_in_North_American_cities.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:10, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OH BOT U SO CRAZY. THAT URL GIVES ME LIKE A 503 ERROR. I DON'T DIG THAT. FUCK OFF. Crunk Cup (talk) 21:16, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:31, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

all caps[edit]

While you are correct to remove those External links to "Know your meme," could you please stop using ALL CAPS edit summaries? In general, the use of all caps is considered shouting, and thus not a polite way of communicating here. Thanks. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:24, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

THX 4 YOUR CONCERN BUT MY CAPS LOCK IS BROKEN. BEST REGARDS.Crunk Cup (talk) 04:40, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Interestingly enough, that's not true, given that both before and after this message you typed in mixed case. Please do not continue shouting. Thank you. Qwyrxian (talk) 04:44, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And even if it were true the proper thing to do would be to stop editing until you've got a functioning keyboard. Politeness is important on Wikipedia, especially in potentially contentious situations such as when removing references. Better to let the links sit for a few days IMO, there's no rush. Bryan Derksen (talk) 06:50, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please review the sub-title, as it seems most of your concerns have been resolved on that featured list candidate. Thanks. --K.Annoyomous (talk) 21:31, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
A very belated Bravo for your contributions at Humboldt Senior High School, a truly awesome school article. Thanks! Gtwfan52 (talk) 06:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
==Disambiguation link notification for February 10==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Neighborhoods in Saint Paul, Minnesota, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Summit Avenue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MUH BAD DAWG! Crunk Cup (talk) 01:33, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]