User talk:Cumanche

Welcome

Hello, Cumanche! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Synchronism (talk) 18:32, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Genízaro. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at thewelcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Synchronism (talk) 18:32, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Genizaro article

We're obviously butting heads. I think we should reach some kind of compromise to prevent further reverts. Lechonero (talk) 23:15, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have reverted my changes twice within 24 hours without any effort to compromise. If you do this more than three times within 24 hours to the same article I will report you for a 3RR which will likey result in your account being blocked. Lechonero (talk) 03:15, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My Response

I have moved this discussion to the talk page of the Genizaro article. Please respond there. Lechonero (talk) 14:39, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Compromise

I see you made some changes to the Genizaro article without considering my compromise I suggested on this article's talk page. I'm going to leave the article alone for a day or two to see what you do. If you don't respond, I'm going to use the compromise I suggested, with or without your approval. Lechonero (talk) 21:33, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My Report

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

I've reported your refusal to compromise on the WP:ANI. Lechonero (talk) 15:58, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gen%C3%ADzaro#My_response Lechonero (talk) 00:58, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Lechonero (talk) 21:34, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment in archives

The archives are a record of what has been said. Any edits should be restricted to technical aspects. As a result, I reverted your addition. Even if a page has been protected, it can be edited by request. If you can gain consensus, by offering sourced content that meets other editors approval (with their changes and suggestions to which there is agreement), you can request that it be added by an admin. It might help not to think of it as frozen, so much as stationary, giving you time to build an ironclad case.Novangelis (talk) 14:45, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See [1] Lechonero (talk) 23:46, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have reported you for two personal attacks against me. See the report here: [2] Lechonero (talk) 16:51, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Compromise

The Genizaro article will be unprotected in two days. You've made no effort to compromise with me. If you revert my edits, I will revert them back. Therefore I strongly suggest you compromise with me. I will repeat my compromise in case you forgot it: Let's avoid using the phrases Indian and Native American. Let's use the names of individual tribes instead. Lechonero (talk) 01:51, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

Your sockpuppet has now been blocked in accordance with Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cumanche. I am not blocking this account, but this is your only warning with regards to sockpuppetry. You should not abuse multiple accounts for the purpose of avoiding scrutiny or edit warring. Any further sockpuppets will lead to a block of this account. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me. Regards, Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 16:46, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Shirik!

Shirik. I appreciate your consideration in this matter. I was not aware of the wiki I fraction but I have no problem with bgalleg being closed. I would like for you to take a close look at the Genizaro page and it's revisions. I continue to be dumbfounded as to why Lechonero is fixated on taking the word Indian out of a page about an American Indian group. (see references). He/she had the page frozen for a month and has continued to alter the page in a way that greatly alters it's accuracy. Lechonero has him/herself admitted to having no knowledge of the topic. I understand multiple editing and contributions. But I cannot understand attempting to alter the meaning of a topic he/she knows nothing about and openly admits to this. (see discussion in Cumanche page).

Thank you for your time and consideration

CumancheCumanche (talk) 21:46, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism and 3RR

Warnings

Welcome to Wikipedia! Although one of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view, we would like to remind you not to undo other people's edits, without explaining why in an edit summary. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Thank you.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia as you did to Genizaro. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

My Comments

You seemed to have resumed edit warring with me. Also you vandalized the first paragraph of the Genizaro article by repeatedly inserting your Wikipedia signature in the text. Both of these behaviors will only get this account blocked as well. I'm going to state my compromise again: Let's not use the terms Native American or Indian. Let's use the names of individual tribes instead. The word Indian is only truly accurate when used to refer to people born in India and their descendants. Lechonero (talk) 03:37, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, what do you have against the word "shepherd"? Lechonero (talk) 03:54, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cumanche Response

Dear Wiki editors. The edits I have made are constructive. I have included references along with the edits. All of my edits have been made in the spirit of providing accuracy and as much information about Genizaros, who were Indian Slaves in the Southwest. The term Indian is clearly widely used in the United States to refer to the Indigenous Peoples who resided in the Americas before European occupation. The United States BIA for example is the Bureau of Indian Affairs. It is in reference to Indigenous peoples of the Americas.

Best to you

Cumanche Cumanche (talk) 14:22, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits. It appears you may be engaged in an edit war. The three-revert rule (3RR) prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. Thank you.

This hardly constitutes a compromise. You simply are asserting you're correct. I'm going to state my compromise again: Let's not use the terms Native American or Indian. Let's use the names of individual tribes instead. The word Indian is only truly accurate when used to refer to people born in India and their descendants. Lechonero (talk) 17:21, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]