User talk:Cutesolar

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Cutesolar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page 314 (disambiguation) has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:06, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of states with limited recognition, did not appear constructive and has been or will be undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:09, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of states with limited recognition, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Baking Soda (talk) 08:36, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of CNS control[edit]

The article CNS control has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has no references, and is incomprehensible, and it isn't clear what encyclopedic topic it is about.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 10:44, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have challenged the proposed deletion at User talk:Robert McClenon. Technically, this prevents the deletion of the article under the proposed deletion process. However, it is my opinion that the article meets the speedy deletion criteria, and this process is independent of whether or not the article has been proposed for deletion and whether or not the deletion has been challenged.
The article duplicates an already existing topic Electronic harassment; as such, it is liable for deletion under the criterion A10. In addition to that, I note that the article consists of a conspiracy theory presented as a fact, is poorly written, and contains no references. As such, it contains no content worth merging in the existing article; likewise, the title doesn't seem to be a plausible redirect.
For this reason I have deleted the page. If you disagree with my decision, you can challenge it at deletion review. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:47, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Murderers Are Destroying My Nervous System (I Need Help!) (Remote Control)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Murderers Are Destroying My Nervous System (I Need Help!) (Remote Control) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 23:17, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017[edit]

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Murderers Are Destroying My Nervous System (I Need Help!) (Remote Control), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 04:57, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 17:08, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cutesolar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to edit my user talk page + some time has passed from the block.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.