User talk:CyberSkull/Template:US Supreme Court Case
Appearance
Miller v. California | |
---|---|
![]() The Supreme Court of the United States | |
Argued: | January 18-19, 1972 |
Reargued: | November 7, 1972 |
Decided: | June 21, 1973 |
Full case name: | Marvin Miller v. State of California |
Case # | {{{case}}} |
Citations: | 413 U.S. 15 (1973) |
Prior History: | Summary affirmation of jury verdict by Appellate Department, Superior Court of California, County of Orange, was unpublished. |
Holdings Obscene materials are defined as those that the average person, applying contemporary community standards, find, taken as a whole, appeal to the prurient interest; that depict or describe, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by applicable state law; and that, taken as a whole, lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
| |
Court Membership
| |
Case Opinions
| |
Laws Applied U.S. Const. amend. I; Cal. Penal Code 311.2(a) |
Miller v. California | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Supreme Court of the United States | ||||||||
Argued January 18-19, 1972 Reargued November 7, 1972 Decided June 21, 1973 | ||||||||
| ||||||||
Holding | ||||||||
Obscene materials are defined as those that the average person, applying contemporary community standards, find, taken as a whole, appeal to the prurient interest; that depict or describe, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by applicable state law; and that, taken as a whole, lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. | ||||||||
Court membership | ||||||||
| ||||||||
Case opinions | ||||||||
| ||||||||
Laws applied | ||||||||
U.S. Const. amend. I; Cal. Penal Code 311.2(a) |
Discussion
[edit]I didn't understand wikipedia's infobox language until you created one. My apologies. I think I've got something that is similar to the current ones (I stole the formatting from Roe). It's here, but I can't figure out the QiF formatting necessary to hide blocks if they are unnecessary for an article. Is this possible? --User:Kchase02 (T, C, e) 00:31, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
- QIF isn't used anymore in favor of #if, which I will be applying to the template here todayish. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 21:18, 12 May 2006 (UTC)