User talk:Cybersps
Welcome![edit]
Hello, Cybersps, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:CyberSPS, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.
Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.
New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
- Article development
- Standard layout
- Lead section
- The perfect article
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! firefly ( t · c ) 13:33, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
I have not violate the wikipedia. I just added neutral content about a company. many companies have already neutral content aboutt heir history such as NCC Group. why you do not delete them??
{{unblock|I did not violate the wikipedia, if you want, you can change my username. but similar to other companies I only added neutral information. No advertisement. NCC group or other companies also did the same. if you deleted my page. you have to delete all pages from all companies that exist in wikipedia. why donot you do it? I found it not fair}
Cybersps (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Requested username:
Request reason:
Decline reason:
- Similar to any other companies that already wikipedia contains. I only added a neutral company page and general information about the establishment. that was no advertisement that a person mistakenly deleted my page and blocked my account as spam. This is no spam. this was a real company neutral page that like other companies just had a link to company page whis is https://cybersps.de so please let me know, what was the problem and why my account supposed to be permannetly blocked. Blocking does not of course prevent having the page as one can create 1000 acounts and again add that page. but I want to see what is wrong with the person that just without good reason block my page and why does that not happen with any other companies pages such as NCC group or .... companies. Wikipedia already contains millions of company pages and blocking only one company page means that you are doing discriminations here. if you delete all company pages from wikipedia I would definitely agree to also not have any such page on wikipedia but as long as I see other companies have and only mine is blocked, I would see it clear racism.
- Mostly, we have a problem with your use of WIkipedia for advertising and as a webhost for commercial content. The name doesn't help, and the new name isn't acceptable either. Acroterion (talk) 14:02, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- There is no indication that the company meets Wikipedia's notability standards, there is no independent referencing, and the article containls links to customer service lines. It was just established this year. Please do not jump to the "racist" business - the submission plainly does not meet Wikipedia's standards for inclusion and avoidance of promotion. If you continue to abuse the process by claiming prejudice in order to get your content included despite not meeting inclusion standards, access to this talkpage may be removed. Acroterion (talk) 15:18, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Then why do not you delete all the company pages on wikipedia and only you deleted mine. I just explained that how the company established. What is the advertisement content here?? ha?? delete this one as well together with all company pages. I searched and Wikipedia contains alsreay million of company pages... why do you allow them to have pages but for my company is a problem...ha.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCC_Group {{unblock-spamun|cybersps| there was of course independent link to other independent website. but the person who blocked or deleted my user at first place, did not at all check the links! so your statement does not cover as well the neutral behaviour of wikipedia. That is clear discrimination. I do nto see otherwise. plaese show me which part of my article was wrong. The person could edit the article instead of deleting it, if he or she thought that one link shall not exist. I did not as well got any information that why the other companies allow to have the page but not mine!! they have also just a link to their own company. and by the way, when a company is new introduced. there might be not many additional link available...
- Existence does not confer notability. See WP:NOTE and WP:CORP for the notability guidelines, and WP:RS and WP:V for the sourcing standards. And see WP:COI - you will not be allowed to edit on this subject in any case because of your clear conflict of interest - your conduct here shows why this policy is vital to keeping the encyclopedia free of promotion. You may not write about yourself or your businesses.' Acroterion (talk) 15:32, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
NCC group wrote about Wikipedia or they wrote about themsevles?? are you kiding or just not seeing the facts. that company is for me just an example. I do not see that the initual page was written by someone else rather than the company staffs and then continued with other companies staff... who will write about another company??
Again there was no promotion here! when just a company write its name, is it the promotion. In all your link I do not see any reason for blocking a page which is similar to any other company pages also with elss content and promotion as other company already as well promote something by having a trick to link it to other website... they promote that they work for xx companies... where we did that. the page only included that whent he company established and hwo it is. nothing else. therefore, unfortunately your statement is not true and does not address my mentioned claim.
whenever you could definitely prove that you removed all company page and proved that those pages are not really created by the company themselves *how you can know this as IP addresses can be changed... then you can claim that I am also not allowed to do so. But as long as I do not see this, I see your statement null and invalid therefore, my account shall be unblocked and my page must be published
- NCC is listed on the London Stock exchange and is a component of the FTSE 250.
- Since responses have consisted of accusations of racism, and that they should be exempt from policy because other people have abused it, I've removed talkpage access. Acroterion (talk) 15:54, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- (uninvloved non-admin comment) After having a look at the article mentioned (NCC Group), there is no evidence that anyone editing that article has done so in violation of WP:COI or WP:PAID. Further the user is pointed to WP:OTHERSTUFF. Lavalizard101 (talk) 16:09, 15 August 2021 (UTC)