User talk:Cyclonenim/Archive Oct08
| This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | ||||||||||
Advice about an article[edit]Hi Cyclonenim, could you give me some advice about this article, Midwifery in Maya society? Should it be made into a section in another article? And how do you think it can be fixed to seem less like a research paper? Thanks! --Ships at a Distance (talk) 05:40, 3 October 2008 (UTC) Spam in User talk:Lunamusik[edit] To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting User talk:Lunamusik, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 06:10, 4 October 2008 (UTC) You got a thank you card![edit]
Adminship[edit]Hi, Cyclonenim. I know that you already applied twice, unsuccessfully. I reckon that you should leave it another couple of months, then re-apply. I would be happy to nominate you. Please let me know. Best wishes. Axl ¤ [Talk] 18:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Ping![edit]Could you have a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine/Missing_Article_Trophy#Claims_for_the_trophy ? --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 18:16, 10 October 2008 (UTC) My RfA[edit]
Your input on WPDERM wanted at TfD[edit]Since the speedy was declined for {{WPDERM}}, I've listed it at TfD. Your input, as one of the authors, is particularly wanted there. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:59, 14 October 2008 (UTC) WikiProject Neurology[edit]I notice that WikiProject Neurology is not a very active project. It might be better if it was turned into a taskforce belonging to WPMED. Whaddayathink? Would need a bit of work, though... JFW | T@lk 01:03, 17 October 2008 (UTC) What do you think; I wrote this proposal in the medicine wikiproject: Would it be a good idea to create a combined task force of Neurology and neuroscience? The Wikiproject Neurosciences has been death for a long time (I think that no editions for more than a year). The aims and themes of both fields are really close and hopefully combined they will atract more contributors.--Garrondo (talk) 10:19, 17 October 2008 (UTC) Neither do I. Maybe will have to ask for help. We will also have to ask people in the neurosciences project.--Garrondo (talk) 10:30, 17 October 2008 (UTC) User notice npa-2[edit]
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:39, 17 October 2008 (UTC) Re:Cookie[edit] Erik the Red 2 ~~~~ has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching! Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Hello Cyclo, nice to see you. I currently have the above article at GAN. I was wondering if you could possibly give it a copy edit for style, spelling and grammar before the GA reviewer comes around. It hasn't had the luxury of a second set of eyes, something I feel it needs. Would be delighted with any help you can offer. — Realist2 22:23, 17 October 2008 (UTC) Thanks for your help with dermatology[edit]Also, what do you think of my proposed categories for dermatology? I want some constructive criticism before I put time into categorizing everything. Kilbad (talk) 15:57, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Neurology banner[edit]Now that {{WikiProject Neurology}} is orphaned, do you intend to nominate it for TFD? Anomie⚔ 23:11, 20 October 2008 (UTC) TfD nomination of Template:WikiProject Neurology[edit]Template:WikiProject Neurology has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 15:25, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Contest Invitation[edit]Hello there! You have been invited to enter C4v3m4n's Contest!. The contest is designed to provide users with a challenge while still having fun! This month's contest is focused on Movember, a month designed to to raise awareness and funds for men's health issues, such as prostate cancer and depression in Australia and New Zealand. Follow the link given above to find out more information. Hope to see you there! 04:51, 22 October 2008 (UTC) Categorization of dermatology articles[edit]Do you think you could get a few more people to review our discussion on the categorization of dermatology articles? I realize the categorization scheme can be changed in the future, but I would like to get some more feedback before I start categorizing articles based on the current proposed tree. Also, I am almost ready to update the skin disease article with a complete list of all dermatologic diseases, and would like to have category headings on that page that closely mirror the categorization scheme we all finally decide on through our discussion on the medicine talk page. What do you think? Thanks. Kilbad (talk) 14:32, 22 October 2008 (UTC) Thanks for signing my guestbook[edit] LAAFan has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing! Some advice about improving articles?[edit]Hi Cyclonenim, I would really like to make some more worthwhile contributions to Wikipedia and try to contribute to bringing an article to good article or featured article status. I feel really overwhelmed though. Could you give me some advice? Two articles I'm particularly interested in working on are Narwhal and Menstruation. --Ships at a Distance (talk) 05:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
No content in Category:WikiProject Neurology articles[edit]To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:WikiProject Neurology articles, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:10, 24 October 2008 (UTC) Thank you[edit]Thank you for your help on the List_of_skin_diseases page. kilbad (talk) 13:36, 27 October 2008 (UTC) Main Page redesign[edit]The Main Page Redesign proposal is currently conducting a straw poll to select five new designs, before an RFC in which one will be proposed to replace the Main Page. The poll closes on October 31st. Your input would be hugely appreciated! Many thanks, PretzelsTalk! 09:28, 28 October 2008 (UTC) a request for RfC "assessment"[edit]hello Cyclonenim - i found you on the "highly active users" list, where an admin (User:SoWhy) directed me in my search for an impartial outsider to see whether it's time to close the RfC on Talk:Papa Dee. if you have time, could you have a look at it? i entered that RfC as an impartial outsider, and helped three editors of the six involved in the dispute reach an agreement; two of the others have been active on wikipedia during the discussion so i feel their silence implies consent; the other remaining editor in the original dispute may or may not be happy with the proposed "compromise solution". but since that "compromise solution" has been implemented, perhaps it's time to a] close the RfC and b] "preserve" the discussion of it by placing {{discussion-top}} and {{discussion-bottom}} on it. if you could look at it and take both of those steps - if you think they're appropriate - or let us know if you think the discussion should be kept open, that would be very cool. it's maybe a bit over the top to feel a need for another impartial outsider to do this, but the discussion's been a bit "barrister-like" in tone so ... so here i am being over the top. 8) thanks weird weird weird, the tildes don't work! i'm Sssoul (and i'll watch for your response here on your talk page)
| ||||||||||
