User talk:Cyfraw/Archive 4
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
WikiCup 2011 October newsletter
The 2011 WikiCup is now over, and our new champion is 
Hurricanehink (submissions), who joins the exclusive club of the previous winners: Dreamafter (2007), jj137 (2008), Durova (2009) and Sturmvogel_66 (2010). The final standings were as follows:
Hurricanehink (submissions)
Sp33dyphil (submissions)
Yellow Evan (submissions)
Miyagawa (submissions)
Wizardman (submissions)
Casliber (submissions)
Resolute (submissions)
PresN (submissions)
Prizes for first, second, third and fourth will be awarded, as will prizes for all those who reached the final eight. Every participant who scored in the competition will receive a ribbon of participation. In addition to the prizes based on placement, the following special prizes will be awarded based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, the prize is awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round.
- The Featured Article Award: Casliber (submissions), for his performance in round 2. Hurricanehink (submissions) matched the score, but Casliber won the tiebreaker.
- The Good Article Award: Yellow Evan (submissions), for his performance in round 4.
- The Featured List Award: Miyagawa (submissions), for his performance in round 4. PresN (submissions) matched the score, but Miyagawa won the tiebreaker.
- The Recognised Topic Award (for good and featured topics): PresN (submissions), for his performance in round 3.
- The Did You Know Award:
The Bushranger (submissions), for his performance in round 1. - The In the News Award:
Candlewicke (submissions), for his performance in round 1. - The Reviewer Award (for good article reviews): Wizardman (submissions), for his performance in round 3.
No prize was awarded for featured pictures, sounds or portals, as none were claimed throughout the competition. The awards will be handed out over the next few days. Congratulations to all our participants, and especially our winners; we've all had fun, and Wikipedia has benefitted massively from our content work.
Preparation for next year's WikiCup is ongoing. Interested parties are invited to sign up and participate in our straw polls. It's been a pleasure to work with you all this year, and, whoever's taking part in and running the competition in 2012, we hope to see you all in January! J Milburn and The ed17 00:42, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The monster under the rug
- Recent research: WikiSym; predicting editor survival; drug information found lacking; RfAs and trust; Wikipedia's search engine ranking justified
- News and notes: German Wikipedia continues image filter protest
- Discussion report: Proposal to return this section from hiatus is successful
- WikiProject report: 'In touch' with WikiProject Rugby union
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion case stalls, request for clarification on Δ, discretionary sanctions streamlined
- Technology report: Wikipedia Zero announced; New Orleans successfully hacked
The Signpost: 7 November2011
- Special report: A post-mortem on the Indian Education Program pilot
- Discussion report: Special report on the ArbCom Elections steering RfC
- WikiProject report: Booting up with WikiProject Computer Science
- Featured content: Slow week for Featured content
- Arbitration report: Δ saga returns to arbitration, while the Abortion case stalls for another week
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
| Be happy in Life!!! Sexymax15 (talk) 23:30, 8 November 2011 (UTC) |
Barnstar
Sexymax15 (talk) I did not give myself a barnstar he is sexymax and i am sexymax15...we both find ourselves in a chess website LOL....i am sexymax15 he is sexymax —Preceding undated comment added 23:32, 8 November 2011 (UTC).
Please comment on Talk:Jimmy Wales
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Jimmy Wales. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 22:15, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
October Wikification drive
|
The Iron Wikification Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is given to Katarighe for wikifying 15 articles. Thanks for your work -- Nolelover Talk·Contribs 03:22, 10 November 2011 (UTC) |
Three new discussions on WikiProject Terrorism
I started three new discussions on the talk page, starting here. I think they're important enough to post a message to all participants. Do you agree? Mnnlaxer (talk) 17:49, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- I will try to do so. --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 21:33, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low 
to High 
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:02, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Serbia international footballers (including predecessor teams). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 23:15, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Centre d'Etudes Diplomatiques et Stratégiques
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Centre d'Etudes Diplomatiques et Stratégiques. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 23:15, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 November 2011
- News and notes: ArbCom nominations open, participation grants finalized, survey results on perceptions on Wikipedia released
- WikiProject report: Having a Conference with WikiProject India
- Arbitration report: Abortion and Betacommand 3 in evidence phase, three case requests outstanding
Please comment on Talk:Sri Lanka
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Sri Lanka. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Help request
 | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I need instructions on how to customize signatures when I sign posts. --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 22:46, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- WP:CUSTOMSIG CTJF83 22:54, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Palestinian people
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Palestinian people. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Islamabad
I see that you indicate that the GAN for Islamabad "failed" (your edit summary), but I don't actually see a GA review or any comments to that effect. Could you explain why you marked it as failed? Note that I'm not saying it meets GA standards (it doesn't), but if anyeone in the future wants to work it up to GA, it will help them if they know what was wrong. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:17, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- I did quite a mistake here and I reviewed it again and it did not met its quality standards. I will try to reapply later if it met the GA criteria. Thanks for your notice. --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 00:40, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, I see the problem--I thought that the person who added the review and the person who removed it were two totally different people. The fact that your signature has no connection to your username threw me off. That's fine then, though a "withdrew nomination" would have been a clearer edit summary than "failed". Qwyrxian (talk) 01:08, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 01:08, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, I see the problem--I thought that the person who added the review and the person who removed it were two totally different people. The fact that your signature has no connection to your username threw me off. That's fine then, though a "withdrew nomination" would have been a clearer edit summary than "failed". Qwyrxian (talk) 01:08, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Barnstars
Hi. I just thought that I would point out that The Admin's Barnstar is for administrators. Having such a barnstar on a non-admin's talk page might convey the wrong impression to a new reader, user, or someone looking for help. Happy editing! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kudpung (talk • contribs) 23:45, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- That's true, but barnstars are informal and doesn't have rules restricting use and different use of different barnstars. (Also signed Kudpung's post) ~~Ebe123~~ → report ← Contribs 21:54, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 00:16, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
User name blocked
Hi, It's sometimes hard to understand exactly what the correspondence is. But I have been away from the office for some days, and that is the reason for my lack of response. I would still like to change my user name.
thank you, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.93.93.106 (talk) 19:23, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 November 2011
- Discussion report: Much ado about censorship
- WikiProject report: Working on a term paper with WikiProject Academic Journals
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: End in sight for Abortion case, nominations in 2011 elections
- Technology report: Mumbai and Brighton hacked; horizontal lists have got class
Please comment on Category talk:Anti-abortion violence
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Category talk:Anti-abortion violence. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Bibliography of biology
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bibliography of biology. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
re: your message
Hi Mohamed, I've left a reply to your message on my talk page -- Marek.69 talk 16:21, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:59, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Help=
can u help me plz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yasminekhaled (talk • contribs) 01:08, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
- Ok :) Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 01:10, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Circumcision
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Circumcision. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 02:15, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
Help request
| This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Can AWB automatically but the WikiProject Banners on the articles talk page if needed. Can you please how to do it? Regards --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 22:57, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
- What do you mean? ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 23:11, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
- I don't use AWB, however you can check WP:AWB/MAN if AWB has the option for putting WikiProject templates on talk pages. You can go to WP:AWB/FR to suggest it as a new feature. -- Luke (Talk) 23:55, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
- To put the WikiProject banner pages automaticly on the talk page via AWB. --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 00:18, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- AnomieBOT (talk · contribs) can do that on request. Ask Anomie (talk · contribs). ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 01:03, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 01:04, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- It can be done easily with AWB, but more importantly, why would you want to? --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:23, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- Likely on maintenance work on NPP but nothing else. Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 01:25, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- It can be done easily with AWB, but more importantly, why would you want to? --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:23, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 01:04, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- AnomieBOT (talk · contribs) can do that on request. Ask Anomie (talk · contribs). ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 01:03, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- To put the WikiProject banner pages automaticly on the talk page via AWB. --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 00:18, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- I don't use AWB, however you can check WP:AWB/MAN if AWB has the option for putting WikiProject templates on talk pages. You can go to WP:AWB/FR to suggest it as a new feature. -- Luke (Talk) 23:55, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on File talk:North Strathfield Bank.JPG
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on File talk:North Strathfield Bank.JPG. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
You've been mentioned
Please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Possible AFD trolling. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 06:36, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
It has also been suggested that in order to avoid confusion, you should use a signature that reflects your user name. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:08, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- I've answered the noticeboard, Regards, --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 11:40, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply at the noticeboard. I see no problem with your AfD votes. But WP:SIGNATURE provides
Signatures which include no reference to the user's username (for example by signing with a nickname, as in [[User:Example|User:Nickname]] are strongly discouraged, as it can be confusing for editors (particularly newcomers).
- Though you sign as 'Mohamed Aden Ighe' you are actually registered as User:Katarighe, which is quite different. To change your signature, you could go into Special:Preferences. If the problem is that you would rather not be known as Katarighe any more, you could go to WP:CHU/S and request a change in username so it would match your signature. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 14:21, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply at the noticeboard. I see no problem with your AfD votes. But WP:SIGNATURE provides
- Just a suggestion from my experience: the most effective way to participate in AfD is to do more than just to give state the policy on which one's vote is based--that's sufficient for the closing admin to take it under consideration, but it help convince others coming there after you if there is a more extended argument as too exactly why this particular article merits either keeping or deletion. (fwiw, I agree with most of your !votes in both directions--that's not a problem--it's just that it would be more helpful to see your logic. ) DGG ( talk ) 02:49, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
- Katarighe, thank you for taking care of your signature. I also agree with DGG's observation. If an admin is closing a contested AfD and someone just votes 'per nominator', this may not carry a lot of weight in how the outcome goes. If the outcome is not obvious, then any editor who chooses to join the debate should take the time to give a sentence or two of their own reasoning. Just saying that something 'is notable' is not very persuasive. We need to hear specific facts about the article topic that match the agreed-upon criteria of notability. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:16, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:21, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Sorry
Hi. I am sorry and apologize unreservedly for my error in judgment re the AfD votes. Quis separabit? 19:18, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
inre Rome Sweet Rome
I wish to propose an alternative. Per WP:NFF and WP:CLARIFY the article on a proposed film, one that has only just been optioned by Warner, is far too premature for inclusion. However, I gave thought to alternatives where something recieving enough coverage might still be discussed. Rather that have an considered to be one about a planned film, I took it upon myself to write a different version that deals with the short story that is receiving coverage, has received critical anaysis and commentary, and then simply included a short section dealing with the story's film prospects. Please visit User:MichaelQSchmidt/Rome, Sweet Rome (short story) and see how a change of focus addresses the NFF issue and yet still presents the project with a well-sourced encyclopdic topic. I think moving my article based upon the sources found, to moved mainspace as a redirect target, might save a lot of drama. Opinion? Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 03:08, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 November 2011
- News and notes: Arb's resignation sparks lightning RfC, Fundraiser 2011 off to a strong start, GLAM in Qatar
- In the news: The closed, unfriendly world of Wikipedia, fundraiser fun and games, and chemists vs pornstars
- Recent research: Quantifying quality collaboration patterns, systemic bias, POV pushing, the impact of news events, and editors' reputation
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Bugle
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 06:53, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Hart of Dixie
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Hart of Dixie. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
| This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |