User talk:Daisytheduck/Archive 1

Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, Daisytheduck! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.

Getting Started Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 06:52, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Long Count calendar (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Long Count calendar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 23:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Daisytheduck! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 23:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

CONSTRUCTIVE??????????/

WAS THERE A TIME MACHINE INVOLVED HERE????????/ THINK ABOUT 1918 VS 1938. 98.212.37.181 (talk) 03:25, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Subject

Description 209.35.160.212 (talk) 11:07, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Tory Kittles

Hello,

I noticed you reverted an IP editor at Tory Kittles for unexplained removal of content; it was clear to me based on the prior edit that the user was trying to condense the information out of being a separate section due to the very stubby nature of the article. I'm not sure why they couldn't make the edit in one move, but that's a different issue altogether. Maybe it's MOS, maybe not, but it does seem odd to have a career section with 90% of the prose content. Hamtechperson 00:00, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

oh, ok sorry about that

thanks, Daisytheduck ^{quack quack} 00:02, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Godzilla

The edit was to illustrate the previous sentence's meaninglessness. It was not the last film and saying it's the last until two years later is the same thing as saying it's not the last film and it's a waste of the readers time. It's superfluous. 65.60.234.129 (talk) 04:51, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

oh sorry about that

Daisytheduck ^{quack quack} 04:52, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

Hello. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Please be aware that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reverts on a single page within a 24 hour period. Rather than reverting edits, please consider using the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. The dispute resolution processes may also help. Excessive reverting may result in the loss of editing privileges. Iarrah (talk) 17:14, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

i was fighting vandalism Daisytheduck ^{quack quack} 22:16, 30 August 2024 (UTC)