Jump to content

User talk:Dallas Crawl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Internet Brands, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dreaded Walrus t c 08:07, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Internet Brands. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dreaded Walrus t c 08:09, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Internet Brands, you will be blocked from editing. Dreaded Walrus t c 08:15, 16 December 2008 (UTC) note that level three warning was removed here[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for breaking the three revert rule, continued insertion of material despite requests not to do so, and no atempts at discussion with other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Pedro :  Chat  08:23, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While blocked you may wish to look for reliable sources that back up the claims you wish to be included in the article. There's no real issue with the claims themselves, as in they could be included, but they just need proper referencing for verification. If you have any questions on whether something would qualify as a reliable source or not, feel free to ask me either on this talk page, or on mine or the article's once unblocked. As a general rule, forums aren't reliable sources per WP:SPS. Dreaded Walrus t c 08:35, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]