User talk:DanJames

My username should be unblocked because it has been done without valid reason or solid evidence - merely adding information that one of the Administrators, Chris73, who has a vested interest is trying to oppose by abusing his role as Administrator.--DanJames 11:31, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Denied. Go spam elsewhere. Naconkantari 22:58, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Before I take this further, you have the opportunity to explain how a web page that is very relevant to the article and contains NOT A SINGLE ADVERT is spam. It looks like you describe absolutely anything as spam because the content and your desription don't match each other in the slightest. I will quote your present response and your subsequent response if there is any, when I proceed with the complaint, which will be in 2 days from now. Your response brings in to question your lack of ability as an administrator because you are completely indiscrimate in what you call spam. --DanJames 23:09, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The site was blacklisted in August and now you're trying to link to it through a URL redirection service, which is also blocked. Bypassing the blacklist is not permitted. Naconkantari 23:53, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you are responsible for blocking the web page elsewhere then that brings in to question your abilities twice over, because you have completely failed to explain how a web page that is very relevant to the article and contains NOT A SINGLE ADVERT is spam. Blocking a web page for being "spam" when it very clearly isn't warrants further investigation into your motives, which is what I will request. Administrators can be removed for misconduct or incompetence. --DanJames 12:41, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]