User talk:Dancornea

2

Image copyright problem with Image:Camisa oficial amarela2008 mad.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Camisa oficial amarela2008 mad.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:58, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of DANIEL Rodrigues Damião[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article DANIEL Rodrigues Damião, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ~ AmeIiorate _{U T C} @ 10:52, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Bangu stadium.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Bangu stadium.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? J Milburn (talk) 11:24, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Bangu3dstadium.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bangu3dstadium.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 11:44, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Bangu3dstadium.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Bangu3dstadium.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 23:38, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Daniel Rodrigues Damião has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Rror (talk) 12:41, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Fábio Marcelo de Oliveira[edit]

A tag has been placed on Fábio Marcelo de Oliveira requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 12:00, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jones Leandro Souza da Silva[edit]

A tag has been placed on Jones Leandro Souza da Silva requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. macbookair3140 (talk) 15:44, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Critical[edit]

Please read WP:FU, WP:ARTICLE, and WP:VAND. --macbookair3140 (talk) 15:46, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect intellectual property rights - do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view when editing articles - this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such information or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, doing so will result your account being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! macbookair3140 (talk) 15:46, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions[edit]

You seem to be creating a number of entries about Brazilian football players that contain nothing more than the player's name, age, and club. Wikipedia is not just a list of names; it is an encyclopedia that is supposed to provide users with information about topics. Please see WP:STUB#Ideal stub article for some suggestions about how to write a better stub article that other editors can expand. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 15:18, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Dani.C[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dani.C requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Carioca (talk) 21:46, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandru Ionita[edit]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Alexandru Ionita. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:12, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Andrei Creţu[edit]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Andrei Creţu. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Danielson Gomes Monteiro[edit]

Salut! am nelamurire in legatura cu acest jucator 'masca' poti sa-mi confirmi undeva ca s-a nascut in Romania? Am dat search pe tot netul si n-am gasit nicio informatie despre el.--Artiphax (talk) 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing; we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Danielson Gomes Monteiro, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. Please stop; If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Matthew_hk t c 19:31, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Danielson Gomes Monteiro, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Matthew_hk t c 18:23, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010[edit]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 18:26, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Danielson Gomes Monteiro, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Matthew_hk t c 18:27, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again[edit]

This time for a week...Please do not resume editing in the same manner when this block expires. If you have relevant sources to justify the creation of a separate article of the same name, please place them on your talk page. Otherwise, messing around with BLPs is a bad idea.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

— Scientizzle 18:58, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Danielson Gomes Monteiro, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. For sure you will be block long and longer period if you continued to add hoax content to wikipedia. Matthew_hk t c 18:25, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Resuming exactly the same editing pattern after coming off your block means we have no alternative but to make it indefinite.. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Theresa Knott | token threats 18:33, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andrei Creţu[edit]

The article Andrei Creţu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about footballer who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 15:21, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]