User talk:Dangelow

Welcome!

Hello, Dangelow, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! NickelShoe (Talk) 15:30, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Configurable Bill of Material (CBOM)[edit]

A configurable Bill of Material is used by industries that have multiple options and highly configurable products (Telecom Systems, Data-center Hardware (SANS, Servers, etc.), PC's, Autos, etc.)

The CBOM is used to dynamically create "end-items" that a company sells. The benefit of using CBOM structure is it reduces the work-effort needed to maintain product structures. The configurable BOM is most frequently driven by "configurator" software, however it can be enabled manually (manual maintenance is infrequent because its unwieldly to manage the number of permutaions and combinations of possible configurations)

The development of the CBOM is dependent on having a Modular BOM structure in place (see Modular BOM). The Modular BOM structure provides the assemblies/sub-systems that can be selected to "configure" a end-item.

PLM article edits[edit]

May I ask for a detailed explanation of why you are removing information to the introduction of the PLM article? Note I moved the information you added on item data to the product data management article. There is a need for more text of Portfolio Management but could you please place this in the specific pages of Product Portfolio Management, it would be welcome. The intro to Product Lifecycle Management should provide overview and not specific. Also PLM is not just software it is a philosophy and collection of working methods. Freeformer 04:04, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what the above means or how to respond - is there something more I should know.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Business Teardown (February 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need sources about the term to establish notability rather than examples of its use.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Business Teardown and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Business Teardown, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 18:02, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dangelow! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 18:02, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Business Teardown[edit]

Hello, Dangelow. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Business Teardown, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Business Teardown[edit]

Hello, Dangelow. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Business Teardown".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:29, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]