User talk:Daniel/Archive/114
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on User talk:Daniel. No further edits should be made to this page. For a list of archives for this user, see User talk:Daniel/Archive.
This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any comments to the current talk page. |
Thank you for your monitoring of my talk page and removal of a stupid template. I think that this had been a case of responding to a template with a template. I had given User:Ratnahastin a [[WP:CTOPIC}contentious topic]] alert about Sri Lanka. As you said, I was assuming good faith, but I wasn't observing collaborative behavior. As we know, Sri Lanka is a contentious topic, and this AFD was contentious, and this DRV is contentious. What this exchange illustrates is the high level of stubbornness and anger. I will comment in passing that I think that an excessive level of anger is much of what is wrong with American politics, but that is beside the point. Anyway, I think it was a revenge templating, and that it illustrates that collaborative editing has failed. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Without wanting to relitigate the past - that would be disappointing if so. The CTOP template is a mandated template which cannot be altered, by order of ArbCom. It also has a very different tone (it explicitly says "This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing" etc.). But anyways, glad it is somewhat resolved, and no problems about taking action on your talk. Cheers, Daniel (talk) 19:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I couldn't reply to your question since the discussion is closed. But for your clarification, neither was I the one who said 'please help me save the article by voting', nor was it related to Baalveer 4. M S Hassan (talk) 04:05, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks M S Hassan, will follow up with the person who did post it. Cheers, Daniel (talk) 04:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).
- Phase II of the 2024 RfA review has commenced to improve and refine the proposals passed in Phase I.
- The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351
- The arbitration case Venezuelan politics has been closed.
- The Committee is seeking volunteers for various roles, including access to the conflict of interest VRT queue.
- WikiProject Reliability's unsourced statements drive is happening in June 2024 to replace {{citation needed}} tags with references! Sign up here to participate!
- Technology report: New Page Patrol receives a much-needed software upgrade
- Deletion report: The lore of Kalloor
- In the media: National cable networks get in on the action arguing about what the first sentence of a Wikipedia article ought to say
- News from the WMF: Progress on the plan — how the Wikimedia Foundation advanced on its Annual Plan goals during the first half of fiscal year 2023-2024
- Recent research: ChatGPT did not kill Wikipedia, but might have reduced its growth
- Featured content: We didn't start the wiki
- Essay: No queerphobia
- Special report: RetractionBot is back to life!
- Traffic report: Chimps, Eurovision, and the return of the Baby Reindeer
- Comix: The Wikipediholic Family
- Concept: Palimpsestuous
Incoming...
[edit]It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Hi Daniel, I detected them editing an article on my watchlist at Special:Diff/1232485196. Regards, TarnishedPathtalk 03:32, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Blocked, many thanks for letting me know. Cheers, Daniel (talk) 04:37, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- No worries. TarnishedPathtalk 08:08, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi @Daniel, I've found another one at 220.244.102.149. My watchlist found them undoing a redirect I'd set up and voting in a Merge proposal. TarnishedPathtalk 04:49, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Blocked :) Daniel (talk) 05:29, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Found them again at 110.175.51.243. TarnishedPathtalk 12:14, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Blocked again :) Daniel (talk) 21:33, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- And again at 121.45.242.35. Spotted them editing Orochi, the Eight-Headed Dragon an article that I've noticed they have an interest in. TarnishedPathtalk 00:04, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- TarnishedPath — yep, checked contribs and reverted & blocked. How appropriate, I'm currently in Tokyo — and staying in the Godzilla head hotel too! Daniel (talk) 05:46, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Daniel, I was there a month ago for a family holiday. Enjoy your stay. TarnishedPathtalk 06:18, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- TarnishedPath — yep, checked contribs and reverted & blocked. How appropriate, I'm currently in Tokyo — and staying in the Godzilla head hotel too! Daniel (talk) 05:46, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- And again at Special:Diff/1245160910 TarnishedPathtalk 11:41, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- News and notes: WMF board elections and fundraising updates
- Special report: Wikimedia Movement Charter ratification vote underway, new Council may surpass power of Board
- In focus: How the Russian Wikipedia keeps it clean despite having just a couple dozen administrators
- Discussion report: Wikipedians are hung up on the meaning of Madonna
- In the media: War and information in war and politics
- Sister projects: On editing Wikisource
- Opinion: Etika: a Pop Culture Champion
- Gallery: Spokane Willy's photos
- Humour: A joke
- Recent research: Is Wikipedia Politically Biased? Perhaps
- Traffic report: Talking about you and me, and the games people play
Hello Daniel, it looks like you're experienced in Deletion review. I'm a relative Wikipedia newcomer and I'd like to request your assistance in helping me follow the process. No problem if you're already busy. Rockycape (talk) 02:53, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi Rockycape, you have filed a deletion review at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2024 July 4. The process will go for 7 days, at which point another administrator will close the review. Best thing for you to do is reply to enquiries there, but be careful not to bludgeon the process with excessive (or excessively long) replies. A nice balance of brief and occasional is best. Hope this helps, Daniel (talk) 03:57, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi Daniel, helps a lot and thanks, Rockcape Rockycape (talk) 04:34, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).
- Local administrators can now add new links to the bottom of the site Tools menu without using JavaScript. Documentation is available on MediaWiki. (T6086)
- The Community Wishlist is re-opening on 15 July 2024. Read more
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Akshay Kharodia. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.41.10.107 (talk) 06:34, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Archiving note: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2024 July 8 closed as endorsed. Daniel (talk) 21:36, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey! I'm notifying you about an appeal in WP:AN regarding the topic-ban from the Israel-Palestine conflict topic area you imposed. ☆SuperNinja2☆ TALK! 15:43, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi Super ninja2, thanks for the notification. Have provided a short statement there. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 23:06, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
|}
- Discussion report: Internet users flock to Wikipedia to debate its image policy over Trump raised-fist photo
- News and notes: Wikimedia community votes to ratify Movement Charter; Wikimedia Foundation opposes ratification
- Obituary: JamesR
- Crossword: Vaguely bird-shaped crossword
I noted during a certain recent ANI discussion about me that initially characterized me as a "far-left conspiracy theorist" and from there descended into a pile-on of falsehoods, misrepresentations and irrelevancies calling my integrity into question that you remarked as a total non sequitur that this article I created and almost entirely wrote needs to be reviewed thoroughly for BLP and related reasons.
As I replied to you, I encourage thorough scrutiny of the article.
Perhaps JPxG, who also irrelevantly mentioned the article during the pile-on, would also enjoy intensely scrutinizing it.
Please proceed. soibangla (talk) 08:13, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I really don't appreciate the tone of this message. Please do not contact me about this issue again. Daniel (talk) 08:16, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2024).
- Global blocks may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may locally unblock when appropriate.
- Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via Special:GlobalVanishRequest. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.
- The Arbitration Committee appointed the following administrators to the conflict of interest volunteer response team: Bilby, Extraordinary Writ
- In the media: Portland pol profile paid for from public purse
- In focus: Twitter marks the spot
- News and notes: Another Wikimania has concluded.
- Special report: Nano or just nothing: Will nano go nuclear?
- Opinion: HouseBlaster's RfA debriefing
- Traffic report: Ball games, movies, elections, but nothing really weird
- Humour: I'm proud to be a template
Thanks for closing the ANI thread about numbers, and also... wow, not a year goes by on here without me learning that some topic area, which I would not have thought was contentious, is contentious. An ANI thread about mathematical numbers is up there with the time I found out there'd been an ArbCom case about tree shaping. 😅 -sche (talk) 05:23, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Tree shaping was during my editing sabbatical (I made less than 100 edits that year), just catching up on it now — quite a ride! Daniel (talk) 07:12, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Daniel,
I see you are closing AFDs and I'd like to make a pitch for you to use Wikipedia:XFDcloser to close them. It makes closing discussions so much easier and takes care of most of the steps for you in seconds.
But I bring this up now because of your closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmedabad–Darbhanga Sabarmati Express. Including talk pages, this article had 25 redirects that I just deleted. If you had used XFDcloser, it would have taken care of all of those redirects for you and they wouldn't show up as 25 broken redirects that needed to be taken care of. So, I encourage you to try it out. Once you get used to it, the old way will seem time-consuming and laborious. It also removes all of the red links that can be caused by the deletion of a main space article. So, give it a shot! Liz Read! Talk! 04:58, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi Liz, I do use XFDCloser - that debate there wasn't formatted correctly to include the other two pages as part of the bundled nomination, so I had to delete them manually. The primary page deletion (and subsequent unlinking) was completed with XFDCloser as part of the close. Daniel (talk) 05:58, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).
- Following an RfC, there is a new criterion for speedy deletion: C4, which
applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past
. - A request for comment is open to discuss whether Notability (species) should be adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.
- Following a motion, remedies 5.1 and 5.2 of World War II and the history of Jews in Poland (the topic and interaction bans on My very best wishes, respectively) were repealed.
- Remedy 3C of the German war effort case ("Cinderella157 German history topic ban") was suspended for a period of six months.
- The arbitration case Historical Elections is currently open. Proposed decision is expected by 3 September 2024 for this case.
- Editors can now enter into good article review circles, an alternative for informal quid pro quo arrangements, to have a GAN reviewed in return for reviewing a different editor's nomination.
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in September 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,900 articles and 26,200 redirects awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!
- News and notes: WikiCup enters final round, MCDC wraps up activities, 17-year-old hoax article unmasked
- In the media: AI is not playing games anymore. Is Wikipedia ready?
- News from the WMF: Meet the 12 candidates running in the WMF Board of Trustees election
- Wikimania: A month after Wikimania 2024
- Serendipity: What it's like to be Wikimedian of the Year
- Traffic report: After the gold rush