Jump to content

User talk:DanielVGarcia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DanielVGarcia, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi DanielVGarcia! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Osarius (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 00:14, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MorbidEntree was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MorbidEntree - (Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)(Contribs)(please reply using {{ping}},(unless this is on my own talk page) otherwise I may not see your reply) 08:49, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Resubmission of Park City Mining District

[edit]

You removed the AFC decline notice from Draft: Park City Mining District and resubmitted it without other changes, without waiting for a reply from the editors at the Teahouse. AFC declines and comments contain a note that says that they should not be removed. They are left in place until the article is accepted, and are then removed by the acceptance script. Maybe you didn't know not to remove them. Now you do know. Do not remove them. Also, do not resubmit drafts after they have been declined without making the requested changes or discussing with the reviewer or other editors. Merely resubmitting a draft is tendentious and gives the impression that you are gambling to see if you get an easier reviewer on the next attempt. Consider this to be a level 2 caution not to resubmit drafts without either addressing the comments or at least discussing. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:52, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to add anything to my talk page, add it at the bottom in the usual way, not at the top. The Teahouse is peculiar in top-posting. However, it is a reasonable place to discuss your article, rather than just pushing it. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:52, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@RobertMcClenon. I am sorry for any confusion. This is my first go with Wikipedia, and was not completely sure about the procedures. I also did make some minor changes between the first and second submissions but was unaware of the rules with the AFC decline notice. I saw the other editors comments on the teahouse however and was wondering about your thoughts. Please let me know. DanielVGarcia (talk) 03:06, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Park City Mining District has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Park City Mining District. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:54, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tseung Kwan O was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 20:45, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Park City Mining District (August 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. MRD2014 (talk) (contribs) 14:09, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]