User talk:DanielZayn
DanielZayn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am explaining why my block should be lifted. I have read all the policies. I have proposed some good edits. I will not sock puppet again now having the consequences. Monitor my talk page for some edit proposals. You are missing the importance of my edits. I removed unsourced trivia from articles. The program list could have been put in the main article. I realized that blocks are to prevent disruption, not to punish. I will assume good faith to the community, assuming that the community is doing the same. I am sorry for sock puppetry. I have read the welcome page to see what good edits I can make. My new reason to be on Wikipedia is to participate in community discussion, copyedit, revert and report vandals, and clean up bad articles. I promise not to sock puppet again. In fact, I will participate in the SPI discussions. After all, many of the best editors have made mistakes before. DanielZayn (talk) 10:50, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Since you are making comments like these at your confirmed socks, I'm afraid this is going to be a decline. In addition, you'd need to request unblock at your primary account. The Bushranger One ping only 11:01, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
DanielZayn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am explaining why my block should be lifted. I have read all the policies. I have proposed some good edits. I will not sock puppet again now having the consequences. Monitor my talk page for some edit proposals. You are missing the importance of my edits. I removed unsourced trivia from articles. The program list could have been put in the main article. I realized that blocks are to prevent disruption, not to punish. I will assume good faith to the community, assuming that the community is doing the same. I am sorry for sock puppetry. I have read the welcome page to see what good edits I can make. My new reason to be on Wikipedia is to participate in community discussion, copyedit, revert and report vandals, and clean up bad articles. I promise not to sock puppet again. In fact, I will participate in the SPI discussions. After all, many of the best editors have made mistakes before.
My primary talk page and email has been disabled. So I am making the unblock request here. DanielZayn (talk) 12:14, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
"My primary talk page and email has been disabled." You do realize there is a reason for that, right? Based on the links provided above and the sum total of your actions, you were given more then enough chances to contribute constructively, and I see no benefit to the project of giving you more, especially after garbage like this and this. I'm revoking your talk page access here (and at your other sock accounts) as well, as you're essentially using it to game the system and evade your revoked talk page access at your sockmaster account. Kinu t/c 19:22, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.