User talk:Daniel kenneth/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Daniel kenneth, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

  • The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
  • Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 15:43, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

Request for help with article you reviewed

Hi Daniel,

You were nice enough to review and approve the article LifeBEAM on AfC a couple of weeks ago.

There's been a significant development at the company, the announcement and release of the prototype of an artificially-intelligent fitness training system, incorporating bio-sensors and Siri-like tech into ear phones. I wrote up a new section for the article with the new information, which was written about widely in the press. As I have a conflict of interest, as per WP: COI, I must seek an independent review of suggested edits rather than make direct edits myself.

Would you mind taking a look to evaluate the request on the Talk page of the article and insert the suggested edits if you approve? I am available for any questions and concerns and thank you in advance for considering this request.

Best,

EdBC1278 (talk) 14:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC)BC1278

Thanks for your review!BC1278 (talk) 15:45, 14 June 2016 (UTC)BC1278

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Daniel kenneth! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 08:36, Wednesday, June 1, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

16:01:52, 6 June 2016 review of submission by Ashutosh Bhattu



Kindly help to rectify my article.

Typhoon Lando

I've removed the tags you placed on Typhoon Lando. As a disambiguation page, references do not belong on the page, per MOS:DAB. —swpbT 16:43, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

5July 2016 review of submission by VarunFEB2003

Draft:Template:Purge button small

Dear Daniel,

Pls accept it --Varun ☎ 15:01, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Procore article - categorization

Hi Daniel,

Thank you for taking the time to review and approve my Procore draft via AfC. I placed suggested categories at the bottom of the article with a colon breaking the syntax on purpose, in order to give reviewers a chance to review those categories prior to having the article show up there. Those are still there. Ordinarily I'd fix those myself but since I have a declared COI for this article I'll hold off editing it directly. Would you remove those initial colons for me if you agree with the recommended categories? Thanks again! Extraface (talk) 18:13, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Circus terminology

I disagree with your use of the Dictionary Definition rejection basis. We often have articles that are specialized glossaries. The DICTDEF rejection is really meant to be for individual drafts about a dictionary definition of a particular word or phrase. I was in the process of looking to see if there already was a glossary article when you declined the draft. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:37, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

On further thought

Dear Daniel kenneth, I would like you to respond to my two requests for you to do so; however, I realise that you will not. Having gone through your every edit on this talk-page, it is apparent that you don't do the whole talking / discussion / conversation / dialogue thing; you've never replied to anyone on this page, or, I suspect, on the entire project. Even to your blocking administrator. And even though another administrator has warned you about this before. Perhaps you would like to consider initiating discussion. Before adminstrator intervention is necessary. Many thanks, Muffled Pocketed 17:36, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
User: Daniel kenneth - I would like to add to that. It seems that you don't respond to messages on your talk page. As a reviewer at Articles for Creation, it is both useful to engage in dialogue with the editors of drafts, some of whom want to discuss their drafts, and to engage in dialogue with other experienced reviewers. I don't always agree with the above editor, but in this case I think that they have identified an issue, that you don't seem to want to discuss things in general. I have seen AFC reviewers brought up at WP:ANI, and it would be better to engage in dialogue than to just be brought up as a non-responsive editor. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:27, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Daniel Kenneth for approving Charged Hong Kong

Finally someone with a heart and intelligence to approve. Thank you! Lx3h (talk) 09:10, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

my article

iam being ask to cite my sources on my article but I'm doing a article on my self so how who I get my sources from my self can you help me please I keep getting my article denied 67.173.218.146 (talk) 02:22, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

I can't help you if I don't know what article you're referring to. Daniel kenneth (talk) 11:48, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Get Changed Theatre Company article

Dear Daniel

Many thanks for helping with the references - much appreciated! Thank you also for your comments re. Okehampton Times. I'll add more references next week and hopefully the article will be approved then.

Thank you for giving your time to read through the draft and improving the article. Have a good day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Temgec (talk • contribs) 07:08, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

165th Air Support Operations Squadron (Draft)

Hello,

Thank you for taking the time to review my draft for the 165th Air Support Operations Squadron. I have added references for all components of the article, and have replaced many to include more reliable sources. You did not specify which sections needed sources or indicate which statements needed more reliable sources, so I have referenced all of the information in the article. Some statements have multiple references, as different parts of those sentences were put together from multiple sources. Please let me know if I need to make any additional changes. I am new to this, so I definitely appreciate your patience!

Whopkins11 (talk) 19:02, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Daniel_kenneth/Archive_2&oldid=1079157844"