User talk:Danis fast game

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Danis fast game (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am NOT connected to Saffron Barker or Karim Zeroual and I’m not employed by either of them. I have never described Saffron Barker as a client either. I have been blocked for no reason.

Decline reason:

I have verified you have indeed violated WP:UPE and have solicited a violation of WP:MEAT. No comment on whether or not Barker or Zeroual is a client, but this does not form the basis of the block. The block is appropriate. Yamla (talk) 17:06, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Danis fast game (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am NOT connected to Saffron Barker or Karim Zeroual in any way. And I certainly haven’t been ‘paid’ to create their articles. And I’m certainly not a meatpuppet what ever that is.

Decline reason:

Checkuser Confirmed socking to !vote in the Saffron Barker AfD. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:27, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Per WP:BLANKING, declined unblock requests cannot be removed while the sanctions remain in place.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:21, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Danis fast game, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Lard Almighty (talk) 11:28, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Karim Zeroual[edit]

Hello, Danis fast game. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Karim Zeroual".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:12, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Nancy Xu concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Nancy Xu, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nancy Xu[edit]

Hello, Danis fast game. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nancy Xu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:25, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]