User talk:Dareislam
May 2015
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/25px-Information.svg.png)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tanzania has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tanzania was changed by Dareislam (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85504 on 2015-05-13T15:58:53+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:58, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Tanzania. Final warning for introduction of OR into article; for previous warnings see User talk:Tanzania888 and User talk:39.32.94.53. Thomas.W talk 15:59, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
![Stop icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f1/Stop_hand_nuvola.svg/30px-Stop_hand_nuvola.svg.png)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jeppiz (talk) 16:08, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Tanzania888 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —C.Fred (talk) 16:12, 13 May 2015 (UTC) |
Starting from materialscientist to Thomas to jeppiz to Cfred. you all guys are wasting ur energies on denial of a simple fact that Islam Christianity are major religions of not only Tanzania but also whole africa. WHAT A SHAME ON LOSS OF YOUR INTELLIGENCE ON DENIAL OF FACTS ON THE BASIS OF CHILDISH RULES. RIP INTELLIGENCEDareislam (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2015 (UTC)