User talk:Darts777

The following request is different than the previous one. Please read below and wait several minutes to let it soak in.

Aside from blanking my talk page(which to my knowledge is not against the rules), and that oops with my firewall. I have only tried to improve articles. Some of my edits were even supported by others, but now they have banned me, and nullified my contributions. Is this how wikipedia operates? With self-imposed fascism this strong, who needs tyrants.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darts777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry about the MFMFMFMF stuff, my firewall replaces the names/ssn/... of my family members with that mask by default. I did not realize it was affecting the page. As for constructive edits, I made construtive edits to bank, usury, and income. However, instead of just amending those articles, people just undid my work. At this point, I could reference most of the articles, but sadly I have been blocked from doing so.

Decline reason:

I took a look through your edits and was unable to find a single constructive edit. Could you please point to an edit you have made that is unambiguously constructive? — Yamla 02:15, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As you requested I have kept the previous request.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darts777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Note that I have keep the previous decline. As for constructive edits, I made construtive edits to bank, usury, and income. However, instead of just amending those articles, people just undid my work. At this point, I could reference most of the articles, but sadly I have been blocked from doing so(see below).

Decline reason:

per Georgewilliamherbert — -- lucasbfr ^talk 15:34, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To anyone reviewing this block, note that the additions to these articles appeared to be uncited and more than a little dubious, in some cases simply wrong (such as this one). The edits were undone due to their low quality. This page has now been protected due to unblock abuse, however, so please note that this editor is unable to follow up until the block expires (or is lifted). --Yamla 14:25, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Attach your responses BELOW the following questions needing answered:

Q:The Blacks Law Dictionary 2nd ed pg612 "income:The return in money from one's business, labor, or capital invested; gains, profit, private revenue" clearly says that income = bussness profit. I can source most of my edits, but some were POV BEFORE I ever edited them. Why was I banned for this?

A:

Q:Why do people just remove my edits? Why do they not just amend them? I thought helping each other was important to wikipedia.

A:

Q:

...(more to come)...

You are allowed to blank your user talk page, yes. You are not allowed to do so and repeatedly re-add new unblock requests, which you've done twice now beyond the first unblock request.

At this point, we normally protect a users' talk page for being disruptive. Please do not remove Yamla's decline and that unblock request; if you do so, I will protect this page for the duration of your block. This is abusive behavior on your part. Georgewilliamherbert 02:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page locked[edit]

As repeatedly stated before: you aren't allowed to keep filing unblock request after unblock request. As you have rejected all warnings and continue making these requests despite being told not to this page is now locked for the duration of your block.

When your block and the page protection expire tomorrow night, please stop editing in an abusive manner. Georgewilliamherbert 02:53, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

Since you have no interest in contributing anyway, and because your latest tirade on your user page serves no constructive purpose and is merely disruptive, I've gone ahead and blocked your account indefinitely. --Kinu ^t/_c 13:10, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've also protected this talk page to prevent further trolling. Perhaps someone would have given you a serious answer to the questions you asked above; good to see that no one wasted their time considering you had no actual desire to read the answers. --Kinu ^t/_c 13:12, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]