User talk:Daru Dakitu
Daru Dakitu, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]![]() |
Hi Daru Dakitu! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Your recent edits
[edit] Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:30, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Andronovo
[edit]Hi, I wanted to talk to you regarding your edit at the article Andronovo culture. In particular it's about the formulation with the word "strongly" which presuppose an academically "solid association". But this is not the case as you can read below:
- "Although there is a consensus among archaeologists working on the steppes that the Andronovo culture is in the right place at the right time, and thus is to be considered Indo-Iranian, there is neither textual, ethnohistoric, nor archaeological evidence, individually or in combination, that offers a clinching argument for this consensus."
Source: C.C. Lamberg-Karlovsky, In: The Indo-Aryan Controversy: Evidence and Inference in Indian History. Edwin Bryant, Associate Professor of Early Indian Religions and Laurie Patton, Laurie Patton, Routledge 2013, pp.142-172.
So, now I am requesting for a new formulation of the stated sentence. Regards. Radosfrester talk to me 13:24, 11 June 2014 (UTC)