User talk:Daunty3
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ROSA VIRGINIA CHACIN.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ROSA VIRGINIA CHACIN.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 18:39, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
ROSA VIRGINIA CHACIN[edit]
I cannot edit this article enough to meet your standard...HELP PLEASE!!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/ROSA_VIRGINIA_CHACIN — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daunty3 (talk • contribs) 20:23, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hiyas there Daunty3,
- The current problem with the article is that it doesn't contain any reliable sources that verify the article content. It does contain sources, but non of them pass the reliability criteria. For a source to be reliable, it must pass the following criteria:
- It is of sufficient size - This means that the source has sufficient following. If i were to write my own blog it wouldn't be a reliable source, whereas a large news website would be.
- It can be trusted - The source has a good reputation for decent writing. The above mentioned blog wouldn't pass this criteria, since it would just be me writing it, without editorial control.
- It is independent of the subject of the article - A somewhat trickier one. If something is closely related to a subject, it might not be entirely objective. For example: If a company would write a shareholder report they wouldn't mention that they are heavily polluting the environment and expecting a major loss.
- Examples of reliable sources would be quality newspapers such as the New York times, Major magazines, News websites, University published books and so on. Right now the article only contains self-publised sources, blogs, a wikipedia article and a webshop, and none of these pass the above criteria. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 09:10, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ROSA VIRGINIA CHACIN, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:12, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Your article submission ROSA VIRGINIA CHACIN[edit]
Hello Daunty3. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled ROSA VIRGINIA CHACIN.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ROSA VIRGINIA CHACIN}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 21:02, 30 November 2013 (UTC)