User talk:Dave Clarkson

This user is a sockpuppet or a meatpuppet of Verdict as confirmed by the user's edits, and has been blocked indefinitely.

See contribs — page moves — all logs — block log

Re your request for adminship: I'm sure you're a great guy, but you have to have been a Wikipedia contributor for at least several months (three to six) before candidacy for adminship will have a chance. If you write some good articles, do some good vandal fighting, participate in the discussions at WP:AFD and the like, you can come back in the summer or fall and run again. Better yet, wait for somone else to be so impressed with you that they nominate you for adminship. (Self-noms are allowed, but do raise some people's eyebrows.) —An gr 13:46, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trust me, there's no way you will get consensus in an RFA (request for adminship) until you have been here several months, have at least 1000 edits (preferably more--I had over 7000 when I became an admin) spread across articles, article talk space, user talk space, and project (Wikipedia:) space (e.g. at WP:AFD). People want to see you actively engaged in both article writing and policy-related discussion before they'll support a bid. If you want to help out with images that violate policy, what you can do as a regular non-admin editor is tag the images for deletion, and help explain to angry and confused uploaders why their images violate policy. —An gr 14:05, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RFPP[edit]

I removed all your requests, those pages were protected to prevent banned editors from editing. You're exhibiting quite peculiar behaviour for a new user. It'll make people suspect things... one false step and you'll find yourself blocked. --Deskana (talk) 22:04, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, on second thought, your behaviour is too similar to that of the user Verdict. This account has been indefinitely blocked. --Deskana (talk) 22:07, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter whether you deny it or not. Both of us know it to be true, as you're not very good at pretending to be someone else... you leave clear signs all over the place. This page is now protected. --Deskana (talk) 22:12, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dave Clarkson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Just beacuse i defend that user those not mean i am

Decline reason:

You are clearly violating WP:SOCK and WP:BAN. There's no doubt that this is yet another abusive sockpuppet. — Yamla 22:18, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.