User talk:Ephery
People think I'm you
[edit]Sorry to drop in on you like this, I know you haven't been active here in a while. But there's an AE thread open where people are accusing me of being you. [1] Nobody has started an SPI about this, and I'm not sure what I can do to prove we're not the same person. I know you're not active now, but I hope you still see messages in your user talk.Boothello (talk) 22:32, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Deletion review for How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement?
[edit]An editor has asked for a deletion review of How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement?. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. aprock (talk) 23:30, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Ephery/How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement?
[edit]User:Ephery/How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement?, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ephery/How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement? and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ephery/How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement? during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. aprock (talk) 18:01, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Dispute resolution survey
[edit] Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Ephery. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click HERE to participate. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 11:36, 5 April 2012 (UTC) |
File:Ephblog header.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ephblog header.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 00:56, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
The article John Chandler (educator) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ronhjones (Talk) 23:33, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Elimination of fraternities at Williams College for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elimination of fraternities at Williams College is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elimination of fraternities at Williams College until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Joshualouie711talk 00:44, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Elimination of fraternities at Williams College, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Elimination of fraternities at Williams College
[edit]
Hello, Ephery. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Elimination of fraternities at Williams College".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 11:12, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of List of Williams College commencement speakers for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Williams College commencement speakers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Williams_College_commencement_speakers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. OXYLYPSE (talk) 07:44, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Robert Gaudino for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Gaudino is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Gaudino until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. OXYLYPSE (talk) 09:15, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
The article Common Data Set has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This initiative doesn't seem notable. THe article is mostly unsourced- two of the three sources are primary and one does not mention the subject.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reyk YO! 15:13, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Could you weigh in on the removal of the hereditarianism section from Eyferth study?
[edit]Comments say it all. Thanks! 40.131.178.46 (talk) 03:11, 21 February 2023 (UTC)