User talk:DavidBasser

This is DavidBasser's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacson Marçal Pereira de Jesus (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jacson Marçal Pereira de Jesus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:23, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DavidBasser! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 21:23, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacson Marçal Pereira de Jesus (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jacson Marçal Pereira de Jesus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:49, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Jederson Wagner Barbosa de Carvalho

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Jederson Wagner Barbosa de Carvalho, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 20:53, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacson Marçal Pereira de Jesus (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 97198 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jacson Marçal Pereira de Jesus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

97198 (talk) 23:57, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PAID

As per paid, you need to request changes on the talk page and not edit them directly. PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:48, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Jederson Wagner

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Jederson Wagner, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:54, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links

Don't link business websites in the text of encyclopedia articles, as you did in this edit to David Adler (entrepreneur). – Athaenara ✉ 17:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please block or pblock this user @Athaenara - they continue to disrupt the article about their client with bad page moves and nonsense, see David Adler (BizBash), David Adler (David) and they don't seem to be willing to actually use the talk page as I told them to do earlier. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:59, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm moving the page from David Adler (entrepreneur) to David Adler (BizBash) and David Adler (David) because of the client order. If he ordered me to move the page to anything so what can I do? DavidBasser (talk) 18:04, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We do not care what your clients want or order. We have policies here that you need to learn, especially considering you're literally being paid to edit. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:06, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also I'll note you never properly disclosed your status as a paid editor - you only listed your clients but did not list where you advertise your services. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:07, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not doing any advertisement on here DavidBasser (talk) 18:09, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you are and you know full well that you are since you've previously been blocked under other accounts and had your previous Upwork account removed. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:18, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're a volunteers of Wikipedia and that doesn't mean that you can say anything that you want. Anyway I don't want to make this issue bigger. DavidBasser (talk) 18:28, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it means we can call you out for scamming clients by inflating your experience here and for spamming this project. And we will continue to do so. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:31, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I respect everyone on here. Without knowing the truth don't blame anyone. That's mean you disrespecting him/her. Can you please provide me only 1 proof that I'm scamming with my clients? You know I'm new to Wikipedia and you should have a minimum concept about newbie. DavidBasser (talk) 18:39, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sure, a direct quote from your Facebook where you advertise your services: Contributor and Reviewer at Wikipedia and I'm a Individual contributor on Wikipedia. I can write create verified page and publish article anyone’s biography or business related post on Wikipedia. If you want your own bio to upload on Wikipedia then Openly I'm offering you in cheap budget.

You're misrepresenting yourself to clients - on the basis that you have experience here that you absolutely do not, that is unethical, it's an outright lie and a blatant scam since you yourself admit you're "new" and haven't got a clue what you're actually doing nor how to properly comply with the terms of use. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:46, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And considering the longer post I quoted was on July 8th, 16 days before you even registered this account, it's clearly a fabrication and thus a scam.

PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I leaved maximum Social Platform an year ago😉 DavidBasser (talk) 18:57, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That proves my point that you are blatantly lying to your clients and lying to us. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:58, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Listen bro I leaved maximum social platform due to malware attack an year ago. All my platform out of my hand. Even I lost my every confidential information. I'm not here to share my story with you. But I admit myself new coz I'm still learning. Btw I'm a great learner and hopefully see you one day in here with same level. DavidBasser (talk) 19:09, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm using disclose the template to avoid ban/block from Wikipedia DavidBasser (talk) 18:42, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, DavidBasser. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉ 18:04, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

See also: User talk:Ghadamakhouls

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

– Athaenara ✉ 18:04, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DavidBasser (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was trying to move this article name "David Adler (entrepreneur)" to David Adler (BizBash) and David Adler(David) for my client. But I forgot to put move request on my talk page. It was an incident and I did the mistake. Even on of the Wikipedia volunteers said that I'm doing Advertisement on here. But the truth is I'm not here to make any advertisement and spamming for anything. I believe that I'm new to Wikipedia and as an Wikipedian I'm still learning more about Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

You need to familiarise yourself with the Terms of use which will explain why you will not be unblocked at this time. You will need to demonstrate extremely clear understanding of the Terms of Use (Refraining from Certain Activities - Paid contributions without disclosure) before we can even consider unblocking. I would suggest spending the next few weeks reading the ToU and understanding how to comply with the paid contributions requirements before you request an unblock, after that point we can possibly begin to consider for you to resume editing (however there are no guarantees we will ever unblock this account). Nick (talk) 18:56, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note sockpuppetry is Confirmed via technical evidence. --Yamla (talk) 11:32, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]