User talk:Davidevanthomas

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Davidevanthomas! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Danger (talk) 22:11, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

You Are Invited![edit]

  In the area? You're invited to
   What is Wikipedia?
  Saturday, Oct 28, 2017
  St. Cloud State University Library at noon
  720 4th Avenue South, St. Cloud
  

RachelWex 23:00, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

May 2018 Minnesota User Group Meeting[edit]

  In the area? You're invited to the
   May 2018 Minnesota User Group Meeting
  Date: Sunday, May 20, 2018
  Time: 4 – 6 p.m.
dinner afterward on Eat Street (Nicollet Avenue)
  Place: Minneapolis Institute of Art
2400 Third Avenue South, Minneapolis
Target Wing: Art Research and Reference Library Reading Room 44°57'30"N 93°16'30"W
  

You are invited. Join us on Saturday, June 30 at the Minneapolis Central Library[edit]

Wiki Loves Pride 2018 at the Minneapolis Central Library
Hello Davidevanthomas!
Join us for a communal updating of Wikipedia entries: the Wiki Loves Pride 2018 edit-a-thon at the Minneapolis Central Library Saturday, June 30 from 12 to 4 pm. We will be providing reference materials, training for new editors, and refreshments. paul2520 (talk) 01:54, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited! Join us on Saturday, July 28 at the Quatrefoil Library[edit]

Wiki Loves Pride 2018 at the Quatrefoil Library
Hello Davidevanthomas!
Join us for a communal updating of Wikipedia entries: the Wiki Loves Pride 2018 edit-a-thon at the Quatrefoil Library on Saturday, July 28 from 12 to 4 pm. We will be providing reference materials (including access to the EBSCO LGBT Life database), training for new editors, and refreshments. Check it out! = paul2520 (talk) 00:23, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your turn of phrase[edit]

Greetings, Davidevanthomas. It was nice to meet you on Wikipedia Day. Would you please remind me what you called contemporary naming practice? Sorry I forgot. I said, "I like English names." You said, ? Best wishes, -SusanLesch (talk) 15:13, 9 March 2019 (UTC) Hi Susan, Good to meet you too, and apologies for taking so long to respond. I'm not used to communicating via Wikipedia and don't check my bell-icon enough—is this the way to do it? I don't remember what I said! It couldn't have been memorable. Hope to see you at another event. -David[reply]

Nikole Hannah-Jones wrote the lead article for The New York Times magazine series The 1619 Project which examines the legacy of slavery in America. Ms. Hannah-Jones explained that names aren't created to please my ears. "Black naming practices, so often impugned by mainstream society, are themselves an act of resistance. Our last names belong to the white people who once owned us. That is why the insistence of many black Americans, particularly those most marginalized, to give our children names that we create, that are neither European nor from Africa, a place we have never been, is an act of self-determination." I stand corrected. How wonderful to learn something.[1]
Just announced, Hannah-Jones won a Pulitzer Prize for that article! -SusanLesch (talk) 21:44, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Hannah-Jones, Nikole (August 18, 2019). ""Our democracy's founding ideals..."". The New York Times Magazine. Retrieved October 26, 2019.

Thank You[edit]


Mary Cassatt, United States, 1844–1926, The Banjo Lesson (detail), 1894, Drypoint and aquatint before color, The William M. Ladd Collection Gift of Herschel V. Jones, 1916, P.4,956
 Thank You for attending Mia's Art + Feminism Wikipedia Edit-a-Thon
We appreciate your contribution. JLLurie (talk) 20:57, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Lydia Purdy Hess[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Lydia Purdy Hess at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:21, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lydia Purdy Hess[edit]

On 17 April 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lydia Purdy Hess, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that American artist Lydia Purdy Hess, best known for her Portrait of Miss E. H., sketched and painted while floating on the Ohio River during her two-month honeymoon? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lydia Purdy Hess. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lydia Purdy Hess), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mia Native American Artists Edit-a-Thon[edit]

Mia Native American Artists Edit-a-Thon

Hello Davidevanthomas. You are invited to attend a Native American Artists edit-a-thon at the Minneapolis Institute of Art (Mia) on Saturday, November 9, 2019, from 11am to 4pm. In celebration of Native American Heritage Month, join in honoring Native American artists whose work is represented in Mia's collections by creating or enhancing Wikipedia articles.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gertrude Sans Souci (June 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HenryTemplo was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Other than the above issue, great article! I would recommend removing/rewriting the last sentence in the lead paragraph, and make sure the rest of the prose is in line with WP:NPOV. Have a great day!
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
HenryTemplo (talk) 20:18, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Davidevanthomas! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! HenryTemplo (talk) 20:18, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gertrude Sans Souci has been accepted[edit]

Gertrude Sans Souci, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 07:34, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Florence May (October 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 14:35, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Florence May (January 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Items in "Sources" section need to be moved inline to establish notability. Generally, more refs needed as well.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 16:32, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Florence May[edit]

Hello, Davidevanthomas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Florence May".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:43, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Davidevanthomas&oldid=1187194151"