Jump to content

User talk:Davidwr/Archives/Archive 21

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 15 Archive 19 Archive 20 Archive 21 Archive 22 Archive 23 Archive 25

Hello Davidwr/Archives. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.

The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.

If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)

If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.

Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.

I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).

       Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

@Fuhghettaboutit: I haven't been significantly involved in AFC for several months, but when I was, there was a specific "decline" reason which was for copyright violations. This was available in the then-current AFC Helper Script. When used in the script, it notified the submitter that the submission was declined and (unless a check-box was un-checked) nominated the submission page for speedy deletion. Again, things may have changed since I was last involved in AFC work. When I come back, I will bring myself up to speed on the current processes before I get too heavily involved. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:45, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

19:31, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

neutral RfC notification

Template_talk:Succession_box#RfC has a discussion on succession box usage. You had previously noted or opined at Template_talk:Infobox_officeholder/Archive_18#RfC_on_successor.2Fpredecessor_where_a_district_is_not_reasonably_viewed_as_the_same_after_redistricting thanks. Collect (talk) 21:30, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

17:11, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

16:44, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Texas State Railroad Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Texas State Railroad Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:58, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. No objection to deletion, as the company now uses a different logo and this logo has no known encyclopedic value (i.e. it's not worthy of critical commentary, historical value, etc. as far as I can tell). davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 21:37, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

16:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Merry Christmas?

Well somebody has decided to give Wikipedia a 'gift' in the form of the latest version of Asif Ali Laghari as Asif Ali Laighari by another likely sock of Princeneil (talk · contribs). For reference Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asif Ali Laghari.

16:52, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!

Hello Davidwr, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015.
Happy editing,
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:01, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} to all registered users whom have commented on his talk page. To prevent receiving future messages, please follow the opt-out instructions on User:Technical 13/Holiday list

Neutral notification

You previously voted, opined, commented, or otherwise took part, at Template talk:Infobox officeholder/Archive 18#RfC on successor/predecessor where a district is not reasonably viewed as the same after redistricting. Please see a related discussion at Template talk:Infobox officeholder#RfC Congressmen's tenures in infobox. Kraxler (talk) 15:28, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

16:47, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

18:13, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

16:08, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

RfC: AfC Helper Script access

An RfC has been opened at RfC to physically restrict access to the Helper Script. You are invited to comment. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:10, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

16:31, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

16:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

17:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

16:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

16:41, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

15:19, 9 March 2015 (UTC)