User talk:Davie243

This user is a student editor in Medgar_Evers_College_City_University_of_New_York/PSY_213_Social_Psychology_(Fall_2019) .

Welcome

Hello, Davie243 and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students. Go through our online training for students

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Please also read this helpful advice for students.

Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.

Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, and if your class doesn't already have one please tell your instructor about that. It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{Educational assignment}} on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and aid your communication with them.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! Jack90s15 (talk) 00:35, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Davie243, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:34, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article issues

Your additions to the breastfeeding article include passages copied verbatim from a non-free source. This was detected by automatic plagiarism detection software. For copyright reasons, your entire contribution was deleted. Please review the Plagiarism and Copyright training module before proceeding further. Thanks. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 02:33, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Breastfeeding

Hi. I've reverted your additions to the breastfeeding article. They don't meet the standard or tone appropriate for a Wikipedia article. You wrote:

After giving birth it is recommended that both mothers or fathers can have Skin to Skin with their newborn child. Skin to Skin is when a newborn baby is placed directly on top on their mother chest nakedly so that it give the baby a sense of security and comfort so that they can have a bonding moment with their mom. Skin to Skin help both mom and dad have more confidence and make them feel more relaxed as parents because they already have a sense of connection with their baby. Skin to Skin have many health benefits associated with it like lowering postpartum depression, relieve stress, stabilize baby's temperature, breathing rate, heart rate, and blood sugar.

It is recommended - recommendations don't exist independent of people giving them. When you say it like this, it amounts to Wikipedia making a recommendation. Wikipedia articles cannot give advice, especially not medical advice like this.
Skin to Skin help both mom and dad have more confidence - encyclopedia articles should use formal language.
Skin to Skin have many health benefits associated with it like lowering postpartum depression, relieve stress, stabilize baby's temperature, breathing rate, heart rate, and blood sugar - this sort of medical information needs to be supported by sources which meet Wikipedia's referencing medical references. The source you used, which was from 1954, is not an appropriate source. I recommend that you revisit the Editing health and psychology topics training module.

Working on well-developed articles like this can be challenging, which is why we recommended that you select stub or start class articles. While it's fine to continue improving what you've written in your sandbox, please don't move it back into the article. Let me know when you're ready, and we can discuss this further. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 00:25, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I also moved your sandbox draft to User:Davie243/Breastfeeding. Somehow it ended up being created in mainspace by mistake. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 00:29, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You added

After giving birth, Skin-to-Skin is a very important component that both mothers or fathers can have with their newborn child. Skin-to-Skin is when a newborn baby is placed directly on top on their mother chest nakedly so that it give the baby a sense of security and comfort so that they can have a bonding moment with their mom or dad^[1]. When you're having skin-to-skin time, you always want to make sure that the baby's nose and mouth should always be uncovered. Skin to Skin help both mom and dad have more confidence and make them feel more relaxed as parents because they already have a sense of connection with their baby.

^ "Breastmilk Counts". Breastmilk Counts. Retrieved 2019-11-24.

How does the ref support this? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:06, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Moore, Elizabeth R; Bergman, Nils; Anderson, Gene C; Medley, Nancy (2016-11-25). "Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003519.pub4. ISSN 1465-1858.

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia and Wikiproject Medicine

Welcome to Wikipedia! We have compiled some guidance for new healthcare editors:

Please keep the mission of Wikipedia in mind. We provide the public with accepted knowledge, working in a community.
We do that by finding high quality secondary sources and summarizing what they say, giving WP:WEIGHT as they do. Please do not try to build content by synthesizing content based on primary sources.
Please use high-quality, recent, secondary sources for medical content (see WP:MEDRS; for the difference between primary and secondary sources, see the WP:MEDDEF section.) High-quality sources include review articles (which are not the same as peer-reviewed), position statements from nationally and internationally recognized bodies (like CDC, WHO, FDA), and major medical textbooks. Lower-quality sources are typically removed. Please beware of predatory publishers – check the publishers of articles (especially open source articles) at Beall's list.
The ordering of sections typically follows the instructions at WP:MEDMOS. The section above the table of contents is called the WP:LEAD. It summarizes the body. Do not add anything to the lead that is not in the body. Style is covered in MEDMOS as well; we avoid the word "patient" for example.
We don't use terms like "currently", "recently," "now", or "today". See WP:RELTIME.
More generally see WP:MEDHOW, which gives great tips for editing about health -- for example, it provides a way to format citations quickly and easily
Citation details are important:
- Be sure to cite the PMID for journal articles and ISBN for books
- Please include page numbers when referencing a book or long journal article, and please format citations consistently within an article.
- Do not use URLs from your university library that have "proxy" in them: the rest of the world cannot see them.
- Reference tags generally go after punctuation, not before; there is no preceding space.
We use very few capital letters (see WP:MOSCAPS) and very little bolding. Only the first word of a heading is usually capitalized.
Common terms are not usually wikilinked; nor are years, dates, or names of countries and major cities. Avoid overlinking!
Never copy and paste from sources; we run detection software on new edits.
Talk to us! Wikipedia works by collaboration at articles and user talkpages.

Once again, welcome, and thank you for joining us! Please share these guidelines with other new editors.

– the WikiProject Medicine team Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:06, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Further feedback

Hi. Thanks for making some changes to your draft, but it's still nowhere near ready.

After giving birth, Skin-to-Skin is a very important component that both mothers or fathers can have with their newborn child. Skin-to-Skin is when a newborn baby is placed directly on top on their mother chest nakedly so that it give the baby a sense of security and comfort so that they can have a bonding moment with their mom or dad

This isn't actually about breastfeeding, it's about the importance of skin-to-skin contact. Wikipedia already has an entire article about that. This information doesn't belong in this article.
As I mentioned before, informal language like "mom or dad" doesn't belong in formal writing
It's also important that you write well. An adverb should precede or follow a noun; a phrase like placed directly on top on their mother chest nakedly just isn't good writing.

When you're having skin-to-skin time, you always want to make sure that the baby's nose and mouth should always be uncovered. Skin to Skin help both mom and dad have more confidence and make them feel more relaxed as parents because they already have a sense of connection with their baby.

This is also about skin-to-skin contact, so not appropriate for this article
You're giving medical advice here. Wikipedia articles aren't supposed to give "how to" advice at all, and you should never give medical advice without a medical license.
An encyclopedia article isn't supposed to speak to the reader. If you're writing in the first or second person, you're almost always getting it wrong.

Please don't move any content to mainspace. Please stop moving your sandbox to mainspace. Please stop this. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:31, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Breastfeeding article

Again and again people have reached out to you with offers of assistance but you have ignored them all. This is not acceptable. Gandydancer (talk) 20:56, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do not re-add content to this article. Keep in mind that you will not be graded on what "sticks" in the article, but rather the effort you have put forward. In general whenever content is removed from an article it is important to address the concerns brought up by the other editors, either on their talk page or on the article's talk page, particularly in the case of multiple editors removing content. Re-adding content will not resolve the issues and can actually be seen as disruptive, which can in turn lead to you getting blocked from editing.

Ian (Wiki Ed) brought up several very good points about the content you were trying to add and I don't see where you addressed all of the points he brought up. Doc James is also correct in questioning the use of Breastmilk Counts as a source. It looks like it is run by the Texas Health and Human Services Commission and WIC Program, but it doesn't state who exactly wrote what or what type of editorial and verification processes are used. It's likely not a terrible source, but it's not the strongest possible source - especially as this deals with health topics.

You have been asked repeatedly to stop re-adding this content. I must stress again that this can lead to you getting blocked from editing, so do not re-add this content until you've discussed the issues and resolved them on the article's talk page. To be honest, given that the article is so extensive and that you will not be graded on the content remaining in the article, it would be best if you were to refrain from adding it and revisit the article later, once you've had more experience editing on health topics. I feel a little bad stating this, but there has already been quite a bit of pushback and you've received warnings from multiple editors. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 04:03, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, you will be blocked from editing if you continue to do this. It's throughly disrespectful to ignore everyone's feedback the way you have chose to do so. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:01, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Moore, Elizabeth R; Bergman, Nils; Anderson, Gene C; Medley, Nancy (2016-11-25). "Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003519.pub4. ISSN 1465-1858.

[1]