User talk:DavisAndrew416

Welcome![edit]

Hello, DavisAndrew416, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! hulmem (talk) 16:39, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Russian Armed Forces, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. --David Biddulph (talk) 04:53, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at United Kingdom, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Caution for unsourced inflation of numbers. New numbers require a new reliable source (the source in the article is from 2016, and can't possibly support numbers for 2017...). - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 20:29, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Economy of the United Kingdom and Economy of South Korea. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Warning for unsourced inflation of numbers. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 20:31, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at France. Dr. K. 20:56, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:53, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Linkin Park, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 00:19, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Italy does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! —DIYeditor (talk) 06:40, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prime Minister of South Korea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:09, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Intelligence Service (South Korea), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Federal Security Service, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

His Excellency[edit]

I am not sure why you decided that the official title of a president of Russia is "his excellency", but in any case adding it to a bunch of articles without any sources is not appropriate.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:55, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at South Korea, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 11:03, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 18[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Speaker of the National Assembly of South Korea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Third (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Brexit Party. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 20:58, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Second Lady of South Korea moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Second Lady of South Korea, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:26, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 15[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Central Intelligence Agency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Intelligence Service (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Motorcade. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:47, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop[edit]

Friend, you have to stop. I just re-wrote Code One and deleted most of the article, which was filled with original research and unsourced content. You have to stop adding "stuff you know" to articles; it's not acceptable on Wikipedia. Please take a moment to read some of the links in the warnings above. Help:Referencing for beginners will also assist you. Thanks for your understanding. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:55, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Moon Jae-in. General Ization ^Talk 13:28, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for vandalism or disruptive editing or both. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 21:23, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I unblocked you after looking more carefully at the edit, but next time you might be not so lucky.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:59, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of official vehicles of the president of South Korea moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, List of official vehicles of the president of South Korea, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:31, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Code One, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Security Service (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:50, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019[edit]

Hello, DavisAndrew416, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as KingCub101 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Begoon 01:36, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 6[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

China (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chinese

List of national mottos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chinese

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:10, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Hulmem. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bee Gees, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. hulmem (talk) 16:39, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United Future Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HoS[edit]

Will you please STOP trying to force the Japanese emperor's image into the infobox at Head of state? You're becoming disruptive. GoodDay (talk) 18:00, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand why there is such resistance to the emperors portrait being included here, the emperor is the head of state of japan it is written in the constitution and is internationally recognized as the head of state. DavisAndrew416 (talk) 18:05, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

He's the symbol of the state, not head of state. If you're so determined to include Naruhito? then bring it up at the talkpage of that article & get a consensus for inclusion. GoodDay (talk) 18:12, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Then who do you maintain is the head of state of Japan, GoodDay? You don't seem to have any problem with the same assertion at Emperor of Japan. Cabayi (talk) 12:10, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just don't see a reason for changing the images in the article. GoodDay (talk) 02:40, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GoodDay, thanks for clarifying. Your last comment implied that you thought the emperor wasn't HoS. Cabayi (talk) 10:50, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Emperors of Japan[edit]

Howdy. When an emperor or former emperor is still living? we use their birth name, not the era name. GoodDay (talk) 15:14, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Epistulae ad Familiares. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, World's largest palace, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Epistulae ad Familiares (talk) 10:16, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Epistulae ad Familiares. I noticed that you recently removed content from World's largest palace without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Epistulae ad Familiares (talk) 10:17, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DavisAndrew416. Thank you. Epistulae ad Familiares (talk) 12:00, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Akihito. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 08:35, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DrKay (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DrKay (talk) 21:09, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Second Lady of South Korea[edit]

The article Second Lady of South Korea has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Entirely unsourced, can't find sources that this is an actual recognized position. Korean article is called "Spouse of the Prime Minister of the Republic of Korea" and also lacks sources. Search for this name in Korean doesn't turn up coverage of the position.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 04:19, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]