A user on Flickr has uploaded heaps and heaps of free pics of the many tiny places in North Dakota. Before I go ahead and start uploading them and adding them to the North Dakota pages, I wanted to get your opinion. I am asking you because I noticed that you've added aerial photos of Tokio, North Dakota and other places. My intention is to replace the aerial photo in the infobox with the color pic of something like this for example. Please let me know on my talk page. Dincher (talk) 02:32, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. I'll go ahead and start working on them. I sorted through many of afiler's photos several years ago and uploaded them. I agree. They can be hard to work with sometimes. Dincher (talk) 20:44, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I should have mentioned that Markles doesn't appear to be online. I'm not sure who else among the usual crowd are admins. -Rrius (talk) 20:36, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Kurykh took care of it. At least now I know some more names for the next time something like this comes up. -Rrius (talk) 01:59, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm currently involved in a dispute at Diane Wood with a fairly new user. I have attempted to engage the editor at the article talk page and the user's to no avail. Could you talk a look and weigh in? -Rrius (talk) 01:27, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Are the Colorado & Illinois Senate races special elections? A anon IP user and I have been back-and-forth on 111th United States Congress about this. Please check it out.—Markles 22:29, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 03:22, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. If you can forward a link to Barnes and Wick or something that is more reliable than ePodunk, I'd appreciate it.
What I have been doing lately is adding to the article List of American places named after people. The list, which began as an offshoot of another list, was started in 2007 and originally concentrated on names in California and was, until April 2010, still primarily filled with names from that state. This is hardly representative for a list that implies place names in all of the United States. So I started filling in the list the best that I can. My work since April has raised concerns of some editors, one of whom wrote something in that article's talk page. Another editor wrote to me that someone associated with originating the list should have something that would avoid triggering the orphan tag. The unreferenced tag was reapplied today. Putting in references in the one list article would be too much work. The recommendation for linkage is similar to one that is in another list article, List of state highways in the United States shorter than one mile.
I'm wondering if I'm wasting my time. Anyway, thanks for writing. Ed (talk) 02:52, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Dcmacnut. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 10. Message added 02:24, 23 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Just FYI..... <br. />—NBahn (talk) 02:24, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Lincoln Township, Emmons County, North Dakota[edit]
Thanks for your help with these township articles! Two questions about Lincoln Township — (1) Your references #3 and #4 are the same; do you know why you included both of them, since they appear right next to each other? (2) Do you know why these townships are dissolving? Nyttend (talk) 13:39, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(1) That is probably just a case of one cut-and-paste too many. As far as (2), it's probably a population and governance issue. North Dakota law[1] says any survey township with more than 25 electors can organize, but there's no requirement that you must dissolve if you fall below that level. It takes half of the voters in a township to request a vote on dissolution. Township residents may have multiple reasons. First, they need people willing to serve on the township board. Second, townships are responsible for road maintenance and taxation, and if you dissolve the township that responsibility falls back to the county. So it could be a simple matter of the voters not wanting to be responsible for those costs any more. I don't blame them. Emmons County got hit hard by flooding a few years ago, and a lot of the heavy snowstorms affected townships across North Dakota. Townships were facing deficits in their road maintenance budgets, and many of these extreme rural townships simply can't handle it anymore. I wouldn't be surprised if the 2010 Census shows even more townships having dissolved. But that's just my opinion. I've been hard pressed to find reliable sources giving reasons for the dissolutions. They just "happen."DCmacnut<> 13:56, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No complaints; I expected original research :-) I'm just surprised: how much maintenance money do you need for dirt roads? Nyttend (talk) 22:38, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, my apologies for never responding about the unorganised territories. I'd believe it best to follow the Minnesota naming convention (most territories with articles are found in Minnesota), and most articles in Category:Unorganized territories in Minnesota follow the pattern of "TERRITORYNAME, Minnesota". Only three are different: two that have (unorganized territory) for disambiguation purposes, and one township that has disorganized since the article's creation.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nyttend (talk • contribs)
Thanks for the UT suggestion. That works much better. Aa far as road maintenance, you'd be surprised. Graders are expensive, and it gets worse when half the roads in a township are complexly washed out a by a flood. But a better reason would be that a county with several hundred residents has a better functioning government to handle these kinds of issues than a township of just a few dozen. Thanks again.DCmacnut<> 14:25, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I've found what I currently believe is an anonymous IP editor (173.31.144.162 (talk·contribs)) who has persistently and subtly vandalized over 20 articles, all regarding cities or counties in Iowa. The pattern that is emerging is that this editor changes demographic information, subtly adjusting various percentages of White, Black, Asian, and other ethnic groups. I've written more about it on my talk page and would appreciate any feedback on the situation which you'd care to give. Cheers! -- Bgpaulus (talk) 22:08, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
--Please make sure you warn the vandals you revert, though. Twinkle can do it for you semi-automatically (you just select the right warning) or there's a list of templates here. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:42, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your explanation on the Kristi Noem page about the information I posted on the number of S.D. representatives who did not have a college degree. I thought the information was interesting, and though I'm not completely sure I would classify it as trivial I can see your point. I especially appreciate you explaining your position without being condescending or rude.Sodapaps (talk) 17:29, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Also, another item to consider is that though she currently has no college degree, she is currently taking college courses with the intent to earn a degree (I presume). Therefore, the statement that she won't have a degree if elected and taking office is simply an unknown variable, since we don't know when she would get a degree, if she would have one by election day, or by January 3, 2011, when new members take office. WP:CRYSTALBALL is designed to weed out such rampant speculation.DCmacnut<> 17:56, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Dcmacnut/Archive5! We are looking for editors to join the Smithsonian Institution collaboration, an outreach effort which aims to support collaboration such as Wiki-Academies, article writing, and other activities to engage the Smithsonian Institution in Wikipedia. We thought you might be interested, and hope that you will join us. Thanks!!!
You removed what you called "POV" language from the article Dan Maffei in this edit. I have to disagree with you on the POV wording of the sentence. The statement was fact, and while the sources were no where near neutral POV, the fact is that he voted against the motion that did exactly what the sentence you removed said it did. So the sentence was in no way off of a neutral POV, as it was a fact. Might we put the statement back up for now and take it to the talk page to see if anyone else agrees with either you or myself? --Fbifriday (talk) 05:03, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, you make a valid point that the way the editor made his string of edits was not in line with BLP standards. I do, however, believe that the debate should be held as to whether or not it should be included. I do not necessarily agree with holding it on the Congress project page, as it may discourage people with an opinion on this from commented as they may not be able to find the debate, so I would be more comfortable with holding the debate on the talk page for the article in question. Please be aware I have no personal stake in this, I'm just a recent changes patroller who noted your edit as one that needed to be addressed somehow, and I see a more open consensus via article talk page as more beneficial to the article.--Fbifriday (talk) 05:34, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, very interesting; thanks. My county didn't have any CDPs in the last census, but I see that four have been created; two currently have articles (East Liberty and Lewistown), while two others don't. Nyttend (talk) 20:42, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, if you rearrange templates by moving communities with articles to the CDP section, please add a GNIS or other reference to the article; if we hadn't had this discussion, I would revert your move of Heil and Raleigh to the CDPs section of {{Grant County, North Dakota}}. Nyttend (talk) 21:22, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Can't quite see how you could add such a reference without an article, but if possible please add a hidden comment such as <!-- 2010 Census CDP --> to the template coding. Nyttend (talk) 21:44, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, I'm confused with this edit — was the "Townships" line supposed to be "CDPs", or do these townships have unusual names? Nyttend (talk) 02:16, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I thought it was a mistake, but I wasn't sure. Do you normally eat dinner after 8 PM? Nyttend (talk) 02:21, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I just realised that I misread your comment — I thought you said "I've been eating and chasing my toddler", rather than "I've been editing and chasing my toddler". Sorry for the confusion; hope you have a more restful tomorrow :-) Nyttend (talk) 02:30, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused what you mean about the indef blocked user — is this the Iowa Census Vandal, or is it someone else? I read what he said about me on his talk page, but I don't remember ever seeing this guy before. Nyttend (talk) 12:07, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see what you mean. I'm sorry, but I can't help with this — I'm at the church conference (and yes, I am still planning on the cemetery photos) with only occasional Internet access. Perhaps a post at ANI is in order? Nyttend (talk) 16:50, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, okay; you mentioned by email that you'd be out of town for the baptism, but your many contributions in the last several hours made me think that you were home. Looking at a previous email, I believe that I got fewer headstones than you expected to be there, but I photographed and transcribed all the stones that I could find that had the correct family name. Nyttend (talk) 03:20, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Congress#Installed[edit]
Thank for commenting me Yes, My account has blocked in January 16, 2010. I'm afraid. I read the WP:SOCK But not my IP addresses. I have been to editing and contributions different IP addresses has 9
Hi, can you please cite a source for the statement that an appointed Senator's term starts when he is appointed, not when he is sworn in? Carte Goodwin is not yet recognized as a Senator by the Secretary of the Senate, and that's the official source. Thanks. JTRH (talk) 18:51, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for posting the link to the Senate roll. That answers the question, and you're right. JTRH (talk) 01:26, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again for the response. I worked for a House member who was elected in 1986. January 3, 1987, was a Saturday, so the 100th Congress was sworn in on Tuesday, Jan. 6 (the date provided in the previous Congress's adjournment resolution), and that was always given as the beginning date of her service and the day her predecessor's service ended, so I always thought it was based on the actual swearing-in. Now the members from that class who are still there are listed as having taken office on the 3rd. Very interesting. (BTW, I love this stuff, if you ever want to talk Congressional trivia.) JTRH (talk) 13:57, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting tidbit from NPR yesterday: The Byrd-to-Goodwin transition represents the largest age gap in history (Byrd b. 1917, Goodwin b. 1974) between a Senator and his successor. Which Senator did you work for? I was an intern for Fritz Hollings and then was an LA for Rep. Liz Patterson of SC. JTRH (talk) 14:56, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Tom Daschle's a great guy. Sorry he's not still in the Senate or in the Cabinet. JTRH (talk) 19:00, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums#Polling[edit]
Hey, just in case you missed it, there is an oppurtunity to get a free dinner this Tuesday August 11 and a chance to meet and hang out talk about Wikipedia:WikiProject United States Public Policy and WP:GLAM/SI. Sorry that this is so late in the game, I was hoping the e-mail would be a better form of contact for active members (if you want to get on the e-mail list send me an User e-mail ). Hope that you can attend, User:Sadads (talk)11:44, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
An off-wiki discussion is taking place concerning DC Meetup #12. Watch this page for announcements. —NBahn (talk) 04:32, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future. If you don't wish to receive this message again, then please let me know either on my talk page or here.
Hi, I just created Joseph Walter for another person, but I see that you had a redlink for a congressman Joseph Walter on your user page list of North Dakota representatives, which consequently has now turned blue. I didn't want to edit your user page to "fix" this so just letting you know. Hope I've done right — Aegoceras (talk) 17:06, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You are invited to Wikipedia DC Meetup #12 on Saturday, October 23, 6pm at Bertucci's in Foggy Bottom. Special guests at this meetup will include Wikimedia CTO Danese Cooper, other Wikimedia technical staff and volunteer developers who will be in DC for Hack-A-Ton DC. Please RSVP on the meetup page.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:01, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That USC section you cited refers to salaries of Reps beginning at the time of election. Does that mean it applies to the terms beginning? And what about Senators - is there a comparable provision? —Markles 14:40, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
2 USC 37 is the comparable legal code to 2 USC 36, which applies to appointed Senators and those elected to fill vacancies. These are the legal codes related to filling vacancies, and long-standing precedent based on the laws (in place since the 1930s) are that the date of commencement of salary is the term start, since salary = employment. You'll recall the huge debate early on in the 111th Congress over appointed senators, in that oath does not equal term start. I was reviewing the recent special elections in Indiana and New York and discovered the same issues.
For Representatives filling unexpired terms, where the constitition does not allow for temporary appointments, there is one standard. Your term starts from the date of your special election. That is the plain language of 2 USC 37, and is backed up by the official House roles and the Bioguide. Every winner of a special election this last Congress has their terms starting on election day.
For Senators, which has a complex procedure depending on the state laws on appointment, has 3 different standards, one for appointed senators and two for special election to fill vacancies.
Appointed senators start their term the date they are appointed by a governor and last until a successor is "elected and qualified."
Elected successors to fill vacancies or succeed and appointee have to sub-standards.
If Congress is adjourned sine die, your term starts the day after your election (see case of Strom Thurmond case as listed in Riddick's Senate procedure).
If Congress is in session, your term starts the day you qualify. I'm not sure what "qualify" in this case means, but it is generaly tied to when your election is certified by the state election officials and you file your cerfitication with the Secretary of State. This generally coincides with the date of your swearing in.
I was actually thinking of doing an essay or table laying this out to address future confusion in the 112th Congress. What do you think?DCmacnut<> 14:52, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Are you thinking of putting it on the USS and USHR talk pages, or somewhere at WP:USC? I'm afraid of putting it in the main articles. Even though there's ample precedent in some secondary sources, someone could still try to claim WP:OR since the specifics I've laid out are primary sources.DCmacnut<> 16:51, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You're right about OR. But I don't want to subsume it into the talk page dustbin. How about putting it in the main articles, see what happens, and look for secondary sources.—Markles 17:04, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'll work on something in my sandbox later this week if I have time. I'm still technically on a wikibreak (my wife has cancer), but I just couldn't stay away from the problems I was seeing in the congressional articles due to the elections.DCmacnut<> 17:09, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure how someone could complain that quoting and citing the U.S. Code is improperly sourced. My best wishes for your wife's speedy recovery. JTRH (talk) 17:39, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 December 5#Utah Territory's At-large congressional district[edit]
Invitation to join WikiProject United States[edit]
Hello, Dcmacnut/Archive5! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!
Description: There will be a behind-the-scenes tour of the National Archives and you will learn more about what NARA does. We will also have a mini-film screening featuring FedFlix videos along with a special message from Jimmy Wales. In the afternoon, there will be lightning talks by Wikimedians (signup to speak), wiki-trivia, and cupcakes to celebrate!
Details & RSVP: Details about the event are on our Washington, DC tenwiki page.
Please RSVP soon as possible, as there likely will be a cap on number of attendees that NARA can accommodate.
Would you mind going to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abbotts Mill, Delaware and commenting with your opinion on the deletion I proposed? As a past contributor to articles for deletion in Delaware and with your geography knowledge, I thought you may be able to offer insight whether Abbotts Mill, Delaware is a community or not. Thanks. Superman7515 (talk) 19:55, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wikimania 2012 bid, DC chapter & next meetup![edit]
At WikiXDC in January, User:Harej proposed that DC submit a bid to host Wikimania 2012. A bid and organizing committee is being formed and seeks additional volunteers to help. Please look at our bid page and sign up if you want to help out. You can also signup for the bid team's email list.
To support the Wikimania bid, more events like WikiXDC, and outreach activities like collaborations with the Smithsonian (ongoing) and National Archives, there also has been discussion of forming Wikimedia DC, as an official Wikimedia chapter. You can express interest and contribute to chapter discussions on the Wikimedia DC Meta-Wiki pages.
To discuss all this and meet up with special guest, Dutch Wikipedian User:Kim Bruning, there will be a meetup, Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 16 this Tuesday at 7pm, at Capitol City Brewery, Metro Center. There will be a pre-meetup Wikimania team meeting at 6pm at the same location.
Apologies for the short notice for this meetup, but let's discuss when, where & what for DC Meetup #17. Also, if you haven't yet, please join wikimedia-dc mailing list to stay informed. Cheers, User:Aude (talk)
Greetings. I noticed that you are one of the members of WikiProject United States Government that are still active so I wanted to ask you a question. It appears that this project is mostly inactive aside from what the members might be doing independently. I was considering suggesting that this project be pulled in under WikiProject United States and wanted to solicit comments from some of this projects members before doing so. As with Washington DC and the others the project would for the most part maintain its own independence but I believe this would benefit both projects. What do you think about this? --Kumioko (talk) 23:55, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The next DC Wikimedia meetup is scheduled for Saturday, May 7, 3:30-5:30 pm at the Tenleytown Library (adjacent to the Tenleytown Metro Station, Red Line), followed by dinner & socializing at some nearby place.
This is the first official meeting of our proposed Wikimedia DC chapter, with discussion of bylaws and next steps. Other agenda items include, update everyone on our successful Wikimania bid and next steps in the planning process, discuss upcoming activities that we want to do over the summer and fall, and more.
Please RSVP here and see a list of additional tentatively planned meetups & activities for late May & June on the Wikipedia:Meetup/DC page.
The May 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
The June 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the National Archives and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created WP:NARA to launch these efforts.
There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please sign up and introduce yourself. Dominic·t 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Smithsonian Archives of American Art Backstage Pass[edit]
The Smithsonian is hosting its first Backstage Pass at the Archives of American Art on Friday, July 29. 10 Wikimedians will experience the behind the scenes aspects of archiving the world's largest collection of documents and photographs related to American art. After a complimentary lunch, an edit-a-thon will take place and prizes will be awarded. Followed by an evening happy hour. We hope you'll participate! SarahStierch (talk) 14:15, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You are invited to the first Wikipedia Baltimore meetup on Saturday, July 23, 10:00am-12:30pm at the Walters Art Museum. Come meet Wikimedians, learn about GLAM-Wiki partnerships, get involved, and discuss future wiki outreach and activities in the Baltimore area!
There also is a Wikipedia & Cultural Heritage at the Young Preservationist Happy Hour on Friday, July 22, 6:30pm at the Midtown Yacht Club, an unpretentious neighborhood pub.
Note: You can remove your name from the Baltimore meetup invite list here. -- Message delivered by AudeBot, on behalf of User:Aude
The first ever WikiProject National Archives newsletter has been published. Please read on to find out what we're up to and how to help out! There are many opportunities for getting more involved. Dominic·t 21:21, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This week, our first multilingual featured article contest was announced. We are aiming to improve the articles on the Declaration of Independence, Constitution, or Bill of Rights to featured or good status in English and other languages. Prizes for winners will be a gift package from the National Archives including a book of your choice or a tote bag, and other swag, plus, of course, a special barnstar.
August 6 backstage pass
Plans are in the works for a meetup and backstage pass event at the National Archives II facility in College Park, MD. There will be a regular social meetup, a discussion with Dominic about WP:NARA, a tour of the building by NARA staff, and then time for a scanathon and editathon in the research rooms and library until the building closes at 5 pm. Keep your schedules open!
The National Archives' Archival Recovery Team (ART) is a team of law enforcement agents and archivists who investigate NARA's lost and stolen documents. They have received media attention ([2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]) and would like to request an article be written for the team, if Wikipedians deem it notable. It is hoped that making more information about the group available on Wikipedia will increase public awareness of the documents they are seeking to recover.
Ongoing
Today's Document challenge
The Today's Document challenge is an opportunity for Wikipedians to get their work related to National Archives holdings spotlighted on Archives.gov and the National Archives' tumblr. Each day the National Archives selects a document related to the day's date to showcase. The goal is to get articles related to the selected documents on the main page in ""Did You Know...?" the same day that the National Archives features the document. Alternatively, other appropriate articles related to National Archives holdings not already selected will be used for new documents of the day by NARA staff and posted to their tumblr.
Wikisource
WP:NARA has a sister WikiProject on Wikisource, WS:NARA. On Wikisource, editors transcribe, proofread, and arrange documents. This helps to make little-known documents more discoverable, or well-known documents more searchable, and improves accessibility. See the files being worked on. If you are new to Wikisource and would like to participate, there are experienced Wikisourcerors willing to be mentors.
New contributions
A list of some recent contributions to the project:
The National Archives has hundreds of thousands of digitized documents in its holdings. We are working on a bulk upload to Commons of one particular cache of about 123,000 TIFF master files in the next few days! Once uploaded, these will require a massive community effort to help categorize the files on Commons and add them to articles on Wikipedia or transcribe them on Wikisource.
Inclusion in the online catalog
We are currently working on a system for including links to pages on Wikimedia projects in the National Archives online catalog. The Wikimedia projects are hosting an increasing number of transcriptions of National Archives documents and high-quality image and video files that are not available through NARA's own site. Links to these Wikimedia pages in the documents' actual catalog records will benefit the end user by providing them access to further resources about the documents, and they will also demonstrate the National Archives commitment to supporting Wikimedians' efforts.
To stop receiving this newsletter, please remove your name from the list.
The July 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
DC Meetup 21 - Who should come? You should. Really.
DC MEETUP 21 is July 29! This meet up will involve Wikipedians from the area as well as Wiki-loving GLAM professionals. See you Friday! SarahStierch (talk) 16:32, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
On Saturday, August 6, the National Archives is hosting a Wikipedia meetup, backstage pass tour, and edit-a-thon in College Park, Maryland. Meet staff and fellow Wikipedians, go behind the scenes at the National Archives, help digitize documents, and edit together! Dominic·t 21:21, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
WikiProject Writing Systems is conducting a poll regarding its future goals, and we have identified you as a person with a vested interest in the future of that project. Whether you are a member of the WikiProject, a frequent contributor, or a passerby with an interest in the subject, we want your input as to the future emphasis that the Writing Systems project will take. Please take a moment to peruse the entries and add your comments where you have an opinion. You can visit the poll by clicking here, or on the project image, 書, on the right.
The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
election of the Board of Directors for the next two years
approval of a budget for the 2011-2012 fiscal year
report on the activities and accomplishments of the past year
social gathering afterwards at a nearby restaurant
Candidate nominations are open until 11:59pm EDT on Saturday, September 24. We encourage you to consider being a candidate. (see see candidate instructions)
The meeting is open to both the general public and members from within the DC-MD-VA-WV-DE region and beyond. We encourage everyone to attend!
You may join the chapter at the meeting or online.
Note: You can remove your name from the DC meetup invite list here. -- Message delivered by AudeBot, on behalf of User:Aude
You are invited to the National Archives in College Park for a special backstage pass and scanathon meetup with Archivist of the United StatesDavid Ferriero, on Saturday, October 8. Go behind the scenes and into the stacks at the National Archives, help digitize documents, and edit together! Free catered lunch provided! Dominic·t 16:06, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Dcmacnut/Archive5! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.
Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.
You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey
FINE ART EDIT-A-THON & DC MEETUP 26 is December 17! The Edit-a-Thon will cover fine art subjects from the Federal Art Project and the meet up will involve Wikipedians from the area as well as Wiki-loving GLAM professionals. You don't have to attend both to attend one (but we hope you do!) Click the link above and sign up & spread the word! See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 17:18, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
You are invited to the National Archives ExtravaSCANza, taking place every day next week from January 4–7, Wednesday to Saturday, in College Park, Maryland (Washington, DC metro area). Come help me cap off my stint as Wikipedian in Residence at the National Archives with one last success!
This will be a casual working event in which Wikipedians are getting together to scan interesting documents at the National Archives related to a different theme each day—currently: spaceflight, women's suffrage, Chile, and battleships—for use on Wikipedia/Wikimedia Commons. The event is being held on multiple days, and in the evenings and weekend, so that as many locals and out-of-towners from nearby regions1 as possible can come. Please join us! Dominic·t 01:14, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
1 Wikipedians from DC, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Newark, New York City, and Pittsburgh have been invited.
The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
DC Wikipedia meetup #28 is on Saturday, March 10, 2012, from 7pm on at Capitol City Brewery in downtown DC. (11th & H St NW).
Join us for an evening of socializing, chatting about Wikipedia, discussing Wikimedia DC activities and the latest preparations for Wikimania 2012. (RSVP + details)
Note: You can remove your name from the DC meetup invite list here. -- Message delivered by AudeBot (talk) 02:59, 7 March 2012 (UTC), on behalf of User:Aude[reply]
You're invited: Smithsonian Institution Women in Science Edit-a-Thon![edit]
Who should come? You should. Really.
She Blinded Me with Science: Smithsonian Women in Science Edit-a-Thon will be held on Friday, March 30, 2012 at the Smithsonian Archives in Washington, D.C. This edit-a-thon will focus on improving and writing Wikipedia content about women from the Smithsonian who contributed to the sciences. It will be followed by a happy hour meetup! We look forward to seeing you there!
Please join us for a Wikimedia DC Meetup & Dinner on Saturday, May 5. This will be a great opportunity to meet other Wikimedians from the DC area, discuss upcoming Wikimedia DC activities and events, and have fun over dinner and drinks. All ages are welcome! Kirill[talk] 03:59, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please join us for the second Smithsonian Institution Archives Edit-a-thon! This event will focus on Smithsonian history including the history of the Institution's museums, archives, research centers and the people behind them. This will be a great opportunity to learn about the Archives, work within them & with staff, and learn more about the world's largest museum complex. We hope you'll join us on Friday, May 25. Please sign up here! Sarah (talk) 21:43, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: You received this message because you were listed here. If you no longer wish to receive messages of this nature, please remove yourself from that list.
You're invited to Masterpiece Museum Edit-a-Thon![edit]
"Masterpiece Museum" Edit-a-Thon at the Smithsonian American Art Museum
The Smithsonian American Art Museum and Wikimedia DC present the "Masterpiece Museum" Edit-a-Thon. Drawing from their vast vaults of art, the caretakers of the Smithsonian American Art Museum have meticulously drawn forth canvas jewels to import into Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia articles. The museum directors and staff are excited about this project, and would love to have experienced Wikimedians help in the effort! Kirill[talk] 17:58, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
When
August 10, 2012, 10 AM - 4 PM
Where
Smithsonian American Art Museum, 7th & F St NW, Washington, DC
Backstage at the Smithsonian Libraries is part of Wikipedia Loves Libraries 2012, the second annual continent-wide campaign to bring Wikipedia and libraries together with on-site events. Running this fall through October and November, libraries (and archives) will open their doors to help build a lasting relationship with their local Wikipedian community.
Organized by Wikimedia DC, this event will take place on October 12, 2012, and will include new editor training, a "backstage pass" tour of the National Museum of Natural History, and an edit-a-thon. Everyone is welcome to attend!
An oath does not a Congressman make. In the 112th Congress, the vacant terms (for example, of NJ10) ended November 6, 2012, on election day. Right?—GoldRingChip 01:17, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A Member of Congress is Constitutionally required to take an oath before assuming office. Yes, it's counterintuitive to say that Donald Payne didn't become a Member until November 15, but once he took the oath on November 15, he's considered to have taken office on November 6. But that is how the House of Representatives does it. JTRH (talk) 01:24, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
But his term, constitutionally, dates to the day of the election and his pay does as well. Or is that wrong? Didn't we hash this out a few years ago with some other article?—GoldRingChip 02:40, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
We've gone back and forth on this several times over the years. 2 USC 37 dictates that the election day is the start of the term when filling vacancies. So the other members elected to fill vacancies had their terms start November 6, but they were seated November 13, an important distinction. But Payne didn't resign his Newark city council seat until November 15, hence could not take office until today. You can't be a Member of Congress and a local elected official simultaneously. It remains to be seen if the Clerk will treat his term as starting on Nov 6. But when Kristen Gillibrand was appointed to the Senate in 2009, her term did not start until she resigned her House seat. Once bioguide.congress.gov updates their site we'll have the official word.DCmacnut<> 03:42, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The Clerk's office has already updated the seniority list, with all four new members listed as beginning on Nov. 6. While you can't simultaneously serve in two offices at once, they didn't vote on anything until they took the oath (which was two days later for Payne), and the House wasn't in session from the 6th to the 13th, so there's no conflict. Re Gillibrand, the House and Senate have different rules, and AFAIK in the Senate appointments are processed differently than special elections. JTRH (talk) 10:58, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think 2 U.S.C.§ 37 should be binding as for when there is/isn't a vacancy. I thought you could be a locally-elected official and member of Congress; and even if you couldn't, there's no reason to think that the local job would override the federal job.—GoldRingChip 12:59, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is the downside of trying to update pages in real time. We often try to update them before the realiable sources even have them updated. I don't disagree that November 6 is the date the term starts. 2 USC 37 is clear on that point. The House views "terms" and "seated" as distinct matters. So his term started November 6, which is what should go on his seniority listing and his infobox. But he was "seated" on November 15. The Changes in Membership box says "date successor was seated". Unless we change that to "date successor's term began" we have to use November 13 and 15, right?DCmacnut<> 15:01, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Dual office-holding for Members of Congress is prohibited by Article I, Section 6 of the Constitution. JTRH (talk) 15:46, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That's what I was basing my earlier edits on. He didn't resign his city council position until November 15. It all depends on whether a locally-elected office qualifies as an "Office under the United States". A literal read of Article I, Section 6 indicates only dual federal positions are prohibited. So either it's not a problem in Payne's case, or the Clerk's website is wrong. I'm not a constitutional scholar. I only play one on Wikipedia.DCmacnut<> 16:18, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I came here from the change you made to Suzan DelBene. Thanks for leading me to an interesting distinction. I'll also change the page about the CD, which I had edited to read Nov 13. But I don't see any template that uses the term "date successor was seated". David Brooks (talk) 17:34, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
LOL on the "play one on Wikipedia" comment. "An office under the United States" is, AFAIK, any government office, federal, state or local. I would imagine that, just as it would be a breach of separation of powers for someone to be simultaneously Congressman and President, it would be a breach of federalism for someone to simultaneously serve in two different governments. I have no idea why the seniority date isn't the actual date of oath-taking, but he couldn't have voted on federal legislation until he resigned as a city councilman and was sworn into Congress, so there was, in reality, no dual office-holding even if the dates overlapped. JTRH (talk) 18:57, 16 Nove;mber 2012 (UTC)
I may be wrong, since, for example, it's apparently legal in Louisiana to simultaneously hold federal and local office (but not federal and state), which would make it a matter of state law and not federal jurisdiction. I know NJ does, or used to, allow people to simultaneously serve in offices such as mayor and state senator. JTRH (talk) 21:43, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I take the "office under the United States" to mean a federal offices only. Back in the early Republic, it was not usual for someone to be a home-town elected official while also serving as a Congressman. Today, folks elected (or appointed) to federal office usually wait until they're done with their state offices (term ending or resignation).—GoldRingChip 22:02, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
An office under the United States is a federal office. It is in the Senate where continuing on in a state office can matter, but not because of constitutional disqualification. If you get your credentials in on time (before January 3) and show up to take the oath on opening day, your term starts on January 3 regardless of when the Senate first meets. If you don't, your term starts when you show up. An example is Senator Rockefeller who was elected in 1984 for a full term, but did not show up until January 15 because he was finishing out his term as governor. It wasn't a question of being disqualified; he simply didn't show up for a bit because he wanted to meet his prior commitment. The other situation is, IIRC, being elected in a special election. Again, your term does not start until you show up to present your credentials and take the oath, so a similar situation could arise. -Rrius (talk) 22:51, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion at Talk:Seniority in the United States Senate#New review[edit]
The Washington, DC event will be held on Monday, December 10, 2012 at Busboys & Poets on 5th St NW & K St NW near Mt Vernon Square. The area is easily accessible by the Red Line Chinatown stop and the Yellow Line and Green Line Mt Vernon Square stop, as well as by WMATA buses.
Wikimedia DC Holiday Party and Wiki Loves Monuments Exhibition[edit]
Please join Wikimedia DC and four other local media nonprofits—the National Press Club's Young Members Committee, 100Reporters, IRE and the Fund for Investigative Journalism—in winding down another year with a night of well-mannered frivolity.
The festivities will take place on Friday evening from 6:30 PM to 9:00 PM in the Zenger Room on the 13th Floor of the National Press Club, located on 529 14th Street NW, near Metro Center. There will be meat and vegetarian appetizers as well as a cash bar with specially reduced drink prices all night long. In addition, we will be exhibiting the finalists of the Wiki Loves Monuments photo contest at the event.
Hope to see you there! Kirill[talk] 04:42, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
_At_Launch_Approaching_End_of_Ways_-_NARA_-_5900076_-_1915_edit.jpg)
.svg)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Seniority in the United States Senate#New review. …regarding John Kerry's seniority. —GoldRingChip 04:02, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
