User talk:Dedes016
Im not sure if this is where I should put this so please correct me if I am wrong. I see the wording has been returned to it's former self to reflect that 'all' spending passed by congress has 'broad support'. My argument is the word "all" should read "most" or the words "prohibiting all" should read "preventing most" because of riders, special interest spending, buying votes and the lack of a line item veto spending occurs which does not have "broad support". The supreme court has already struck down the line item veto act of 1996 which would have limited this type of spending. If anyone else would like to discuss this please do but line items get passed thru congress which on there own merits would not 'generaly' pass so they cannot have "broad support". For congressional spending it is all or nothing. Please read this Article on wikipedia describing riders.
Start a discussion with Dedes016
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. Start a new discussion to connect and collaborate with Dedes016. What you say here will be public for others to see.
