User talk:Deepakshilkar

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Deepakshilkar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 6Packs (talk) 10:43, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Targeted intra-operative radiotherapy has been reverted.
Your edit here to Targeted intra-operative radiotherapy was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Xby04NBanY) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:51, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jayant S Vaidya moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Jayant S Vaidya, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:33, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jayant S Vaidya has been accepted[edit]

Jayant S Vaidya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 09:25, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Daily Mail reference at Jayant S Vaidya[edit]

Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at Jayant S Vaidya. It is not a reliable source. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 18:39, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for flagging this supposedly incorrect citation of Daily Mail in the profile. However, I understand that the use of Daily Mail citations is allowed in exceptional cases. The article I cited was a patient testimony by a famous personality, Kirsty Lang. Kirsty Lang is a British journalist and broadcaster who works for BBC Radio and Television. Should her testimony be considered unreliable just because she published in Daily Mail? --Deepakshilkar (talk) 07:04, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, because based on previous experience, we have no certainty that whatever is published by Daily Mail is reliable. — kashmīrī ^TALK 10:53, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]